- 1. [TowerTalk] Mosley Antennas (score: 1)
- Author: wbischof@glasscity.net (William L. Bischoff)
- Date: Sat, 13 Nov 1999 22:29:38 -0500
- Folks, I'm having second thoughts about putting up a Force 12 XR31 tribander stacked with an XM240. Instead, I', now thinking about a Mosley Pro 67C. Any opinions oputr there? Bill, N8BR -- FAQ on WW
- /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-11/msg00262.html (7,748 bytes)
- 2. [TowerTalk] Mosley Antennas (score: 1)
- Author: k9zm@frontiernet.net (Greg Gobleman)
- Date: Sun, 14 Nov 1999 08:07:37 -0600
- Bill, have you thought about the C36XR? I don't have any experience with any of these models but it sure looks good on paper. I did last week put together a Force 12 Tango34 and must say what a real
- /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-11/msg00267.html (8,069 bytes)
- 3. [TowerTalk] Mosley Antennas (score: 1)
- Author: pugluvers@worldnet.att.net (James Clark)
- Date: Sun, 14 Nov 1999 10:36:39 -0500
- Before you pass up that Force 12 XR-31, get a copy of the book HF Tribander Performance from Champion Radio Products. I bought it when shopping for my installation, and I used to be a Mosley owner. T
- /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-11/msg00270.html (9,093 bytes)
- 4. [TowerTalk] Mosley Antennas (score: 1)
- Author: scotts@tartannet.ns.ca (John Scott, VE1JS)
- Date: Sun, 14 Nov 1999 15:00:25 +0000
- I put up a C19XR a month ago and it works great. It was also a joy to put together. You can't make a mistake putting a Force 12 antenna together. The C36XR is just my C19 with a 2L 40m tacked on beh
- /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-11/msg00272.html (8,672 bytes)
- 5. [TowerTalk] Mosley Antennas (score: 1)
- Author: gdaught6@leland.Stanford.EDU (gdaught6@leland.Stanford.EDU)
- Date: Sun, 14 Nov 1999 12:06:01 +0000
- BIll wrote... Based on 1. What I know from personal experience with F-12 C-3 and C-4SXL 2. What I've heard about Mosley 3. What I've read about Mosely vs. F-12 and others (N0AX/K7LXC report) I'd retu
- /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-11/msg00275.html (8,323 bytes)
- 6. [TowerTalk] Mosley Antennas (score: 1)
- Author: ssj@nortelnetworks.com (Steve Jackson)
- Date: Sun, 14 Nov 1999 18:48:08 -0500
- * * * Stephen S. Jackson ES Technology Center innovations.lab * * * <<- - Nortel Networks - -> How The World Shares Ideas Research Triangle Park, NC (919) 992-9045 ESN 352-9045 FAX -9044 ssj@nortelne
- /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-11/msg00276.html (9,443 bytes)
- 7. [TowerTalk] Mosley Antennas (score: 1)
- Author: k2av@contesting.com (Guy Olinger, K2AV)
- Date: Mon, 15 Nov 1999 00:53:17 -0500
- A while back I was interested in the same antenna, and inquired among PVRC brethren. I was told to forget it by some number of them, which included one top op who was replacing his Mosley stuff. I wa
- /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-11/msg00290.html (9,305 bytes)
- 8. [TowerTalk] Mosley Antennas (score: 1)
- Author: tomnxa@nb.net (Tom Gerdes Jr.)
- Date: Tue, 16 Nov 1999 23:34:59 -0500
- Ok Bill, first off, why the second thoughts? Secondly, I have a Pro67C-3 and love it. Yes, it is a compromise antenna since it is playing 7 bands and (dare I say) trapped. But I have worked the world
- /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-11/msg00351.html (8,091 bytes)
- 9. [TowerTalk] Mosley Antennas (score: 1)
- Author: wbischof@glasscity.net (William L. Bischoff)
- Date: Tue, 16 Nov 1999 23:33:04 -0500
- Folks, I've had over 40 responses to my request for opinions on Mosley antennas. Many were direct to me, some came via the reflector. Thanks to all. I appreciate your willingness to share experiences
- /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-11/msg00352.html (7,808 bytes)
- 10. [TowerTalk] Mosley antennas (score: 1)
- Author: Dave_Raymond-CSUS04@email.mot.com (Dave Raymond-CSUS04)
- Date: Thu, 12 Feb 1998 22:50:21 -0600
- Before I recently moved to my new QTH, I had a Mosley TA33 at 65' with a two story house underneath it, making the effective height a lot less than 65'. Running 800w, I confirmed 310 countries with i
- /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-02/msg00341.html (12,684 bytes)
- 11. [TowerTalk] Mosley antennas (score: 1)
- Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com)
- Date: Fri, 13 Feb 1998 13:01:21 EST
- Okay. My Mosley comments were aimed at the big PRO series of antennas since that's what we tested. Short-boom trap tribanders (A3, TH3, TA33, etc.) are great antennas for their size. I never said tha
- /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-02/msg00349.html (7,453 bytes)
- 12. [TowerTalk] Mosley Antennas (score: 1)
- Author: smillick@cillnet.com (Scott Millick)
- Date: Fri, 24 Oct 1997 21:32:54 -0500
- Thanks to all for ur input. I called Mosley and the have a 4 week wait. For those suggesting the TH-11 I do not feel that I have the room for it. If anyone had a Mosley 57B they know of for sale plea
- /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-10/msg00699.html (6,887 bytes)
- 13. [TowerTalk] Mosley Antennas (score: 1)
- Author: Mike via TowerTalk <towertalk@contesting.com>
- Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2015 17:57:15 -0500
- I like my PRO-67C3...bought and installed 2 years ago after running a mid 70's TA-36 with the TA-40KR kit on it...for 15 years..when I got it used ....it had been in the air for almost 2 decades and
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2015-02/msg00491.html (11,563 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu