Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Mosley\s+discussion\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Mosley\s+discussion\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TowerTalk] Mosley discussion (score: 1): Author: Dave Thompson <thompson@mindspring.com>; Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 16:32:43 -0500 (GMT-05:00); When I lost my homebrew W5HVV Quad (QST 1966) I put up a TA-36 and later added a 40 meter element. The antenna did very well on 10 but was not nearly as good as the quad on 15 and 20, I bought a Swan; /archives//html/Towertalk/2015-02/msg00344.html (9,148 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] Mosley discussion (score: 1): Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>; Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 15:12:29 -0700; I am glad people keep buying inferior antennas/coax etc. It makes the pileups that much easier to bust.......... Some people refuse to read, learn or educate themselves. Mike W0MU ___________________; /archives//html/Towertalk/2015-02/msg00347.html (7,175 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] Mosley discussion (score: 1): Author: "Doug Renwick" <ve5ra@sasktel.net>; Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 16:00:27 -0600; Well put Dave. I would put the CC A3 in a similar category with the TA33. Short boom on 20m and a relatively poor performer on that band but a pretty good performer on 10 & 15m. Ask me how I know. I; /archives//html/Towertalk/2015-02/msg00357.html (9,887 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]