Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Mounting\s+10m\/15m\/20m\s+monobanders\s+\-\-\s+single\s+mast\.\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Mounting 10m/15m/20m monobanders -- single mast. (score: 1)
Author: KT2Q <dxdx@optonline.net>
Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 00:47:21 -0400
All: Thanks for the replies regarding the mounting of 15 and 20 meter monobanders on a single mast. Although there might be exceptions, the general agreement seems to be that there is a slight detuni
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-04/msg00160.html (8,222 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] Mounting 10m/15m/20m monobanders -- single mast. (score: 1)
Author: W2RU - Bud Hippisley <W2RU@frontiernet.net>
Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 13:39:16 +0000
I have one data point to contribute. From 1986 until 2000 I had a Cushcraft 20-4CD at 122 feet (one foot over the top plate on my Rohn 25 tower) and a Cushcraft 15-4CD five (5) feet above it, at 127
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-04/msg00164.html (9,192 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] Mounting 10m/15m/20m monobanders -- single mast. (score: 1)
Author: k1ttt@arrl.net
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2005 10:26:51 -0400 (EDT)
nope, multi-tower super stations just put up another tower. but before i got there i had 10/15/20m stacked the same way, just spread them out as far as i could on the 12' of mast above the tower. ju
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-04/msg00167.html (8,443 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] Mounting 10m/15m/20m monobanders -- single mast. (score: 1)
Author: Don Havlicek <n8de@thepoint.net>
Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 10:30:27 -0400
My preference, as always, is to INVERT the Xmas-tree, with the 20m on top, 15m below it, and 10m below that. Used that arrangement for many years in the 1980's and early 90's. Don N8DE ______________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-04/msg00168.html (10,695 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] Mounting 10m/15m/20m monobanders -- single mast. (score: 1)
Author: Gary Schafer <garyschafer@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 11:39:50 -0400
I have always been curious why someone would invert the stack. It seems that the mechanical disadvantage of the larger antenna on top of the mast would be more of a problem than any advantage. There
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-04/msg00170.html (12,124 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] Mounting 10m/15m/20m monobanders -- single mast. (score: 1)
Author: GALE STEWARD <k3nd@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2005 11:14:01 -0700 (PDT)
Well, it depends. I have a stack of sorts. A 40-2CD above a TH6 with 9 feet between the two. This puts the 40M beam a little higher (72ft). In this case, the 40-2CD is the smaller antenna in terms of
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-04/msg00174.html (9,132 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu