- 1. [TowerTalk] Multiband dipoles (score: 1)
- Author: K&L" <kmccourt@tbaytel.net (K&L)
- Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2001 20:34:07 -0400
- Hi all , I am wondering if anyone could tell me where I could find information on choke decouplers, I would like to build a multiband dipole and want to try using coils instead of the traps with capa
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-10/msg00474.html (7,633 bytes)
- 2. [TowerTalk] Multiband dipoles (score: 1)
- Author: n4kg@juno.com (n4kg@juno.com)
- Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2001 23:06:46 -0600
- What makes you think an untuned COIL will make a better isolater than a PARALLEL RESONANT COIL and CAPACITOR? X(L) = 2 pi F L Z(res) = Q X = Q x 2 x pi x F x L SO, for a loaded Q of 100, the resonant
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-10/msg00507.html (7,960 bytes)
- 3. [TowerTalk] Multiband dipoles (score: 1)
- Author: n4kg@juno.com (n4kg@juno.com)
- Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2001 17:00:36 -0600
- There are several approaches to making multiband dipoles. Two dipoles at right angles to each other will have almost ZERO coupling / interaction. Three dipoles spaced 60 degrees to each other have sl
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-10/msg00519.html (9,280 bytes)
- 4. [TowerTalk] Multiband dipoles (score: 1)
- Author: b_bradfield@yahoo.com (Brad Bradfield)
- Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2001 15:39:53 -0700 (PDT)
- Breed's design (now patented) had only one element driven as a dipole. The elements for the other frequencies (three total in his WARC example that you mentioned) were "closely coupled resonators", a
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-10/msg00520.html (8,285 bytes)
- 5. [TowerTalk] Multiband dipoles (score: 1)
- Author: K7GCO@aol.com (K7GCO@aol.com)
- Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2001 17:34:48 EST
- In a message dated 10/25/01 4:32:35 AM Pacific Daylight Time, n4kg@juno.com writes:<< What makes you think an untuned COIL will make a better isolater than a PARALLEL RESONANT COIL and CAPACITOR? X(L
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-10/msg00545.html (16,250 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu