Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+My\s+local\s+tower\s+restriction\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+My\s+local\s+tower\s+restriction\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] My local tower restriction (score: 1): Author: jimlux@earthlink.net (Jim Lux); Date: Fri Aug 15 11:13:26 2003; That is, you have a "fall radius within property lines" kind of restrictions. Short answer: it is unreasonable, because a totally laid out flat kind of failure isn't particularly credible (depending; /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-08/msg00553.html (9,551 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] My local tower restriction (score: 1): Author: k5uj@hotmail.com (Rob Atkinson, K5UJ); Date: Fri Aug 15 10:47:37 2003; In the town I'm in, the local ordinance says all residential towers have to be set back from property boundaries a distance equal to the height of the tower + 10 ft. Because of my small lot, this mea; /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-08/msg00566.html (7,267 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]