Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+N6ZZ\'s\s+Crankup\s+Horror\s+Story\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+N6ZZ\'s\s+Crankup\s+Horror\s+Story\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] N6ZZ's Crankup Horror Story (score: 1): Author: w7ni@teleport.com (Stan Griffiths); Date: Fri, 12 Jun 1998 09:35:06 -0700 (PDT); Think about it. If the tower were simply a guyed, permanent tower instead of a crankup, the whole incident would most likely NEVER have happened. Yes, you might say, an antenna can always swing into; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-06/msg00410.html (7,567 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] N6ZZ's Crankup Horror Story (score: 1): Author: w7ni@teleport.com (Stan Griffiths); Date: Sun, 14 Jun 1998 01:25:08 -0700 (PDT); Like I said, crankup owners will find something else to blame it on . . . I think my logic is pretty good on this one. The subject, as I defined it, was crankups vs guyed fixed towers, not 40 meter; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-06/msg00477.html (8,285 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]