Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+NanoVNA\s+Guidance\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+NanoVNA\s+Guidance\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] NanoVNA Guidance (score: 1): Author: Richard Bell <richfbell@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2022 12:47:38 -0600; Im looking to acquire a NanoVNA device but Im undecided about which one. Seems like there are a number of choices out there but Im just undecided about the advantages of one over another. Im looking; /archives//html/Towertalk/2022-02/msg00030.html (6,771 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] NanoVNA Guidance (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2022 11:17:33 -0800; Not a NanoVNA, but far superior, for 7 years, I've been using a VNWA3EC designed by EE prof DG8SAQ, built by some hams in the UK, and using his software and firmware. Very well supported both by Tom; /archives//html/Towertalk/2022-02/msg00031.html (7,509 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] NanoVNA Guidance (score: 1): Author: Dennis OConnor via TowerTalk <towertalk@contesting.com>; Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2022 14:43:05 +0000 (UTC); I have been happy with the NanoVNA-H4 Type that into the search bar at amazon.com. Doc / k8do _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk; /archives//html/Towertalk/2022-02/msg00032.html (6,987 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] NanoVNA Guidance (score: 1): Author: Henk PA5KT via TowerTalk <towertalk@contesting.com>; Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2022 17:00:04 +0100; There is link to suppliers at the nanovna.com website: https://nanovna.com/?page_id=121 73 Henk PA5KT Op 10-2-2022 om 15:43 schreef Dennis OConnor via TowerTalk: I have been happy with the NanoVNA-H4; /archives//html/Towertalk/2022-02/msg00038.html (8,085 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]