- 1. [TowerTalk] Natual "V" Dipole (score: 1)
- Author: n4kg@juno.com (T A RUSSELL)
- Date: Fri, 10 Apr 1998 13:21:24 -0600
- Both a V and inverted V (half wavelength) will have LESS GAIN than a FLAT, Horizontal Dipole. This is because there will be more radiation off the ends of the V configurations, taking power AWAY from
- /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-04/msg00287.html (7,920 bytes)
- 2. [TowerTalk] Natual "V" Dipole (score: 1)
- Author: Dick Green" <dick.green@valley.net (Dick Green)
- Date: Fri, 10 Apr 1998 23:54:12 -0400
- For all intents, then, can't we assume that the inverted V has an omnidirectional pattern? Also, if you compare an inverted V with a dipole that's less than 1/2 wavelength high, isn't it pretty much
- /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-04/msg00288.html (9,497 bytes)
- 3. [TowerTalk] Natual "V" Dipole (score: 1)
- Author: n4kg@juno.com (T A RUSSELL)
- Date: Sat, 11 Apr 1998 11:16:16 -0600
- On Fri, 10 Apr 1998 23:54:12 -0400 "Dick Green" <dick.green@valley.net> writes: When the antenna is less than 1/4 wavelength high, then YES, it is more or less omni directional at high angles, whethe
- /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-04/msg00309.html (9,666 bytes)
- 4. [TowerTalk] Natual "V" Dipole (score: 1)
- Author: cebik@utkux.utcc.utk.edu (L. B. Cebik)
- Date: Sun, 12 Apr 1998 09:11:55 -0400 (EDT)
- Actually, the pattern for a Vee is an oval, with some few dB down off the ends, but less down than a dipole. For any given peak height, the Vee will be more circular than a dipole, but even at a quar
- /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-04/msg00312.html (9,758 bytes)
- 5. [TowerTalk] Natual "V" Dipole (score: 1)
- Author: lito@rpp.com.pe (AUGUSTO YIPMANTIN )
- Date: Tue, 31 Mar 1998 11:23:20 -0500
- To the group: I have made an natural "V" aluminium dipole tappered with 1-1/2" and 1-1/4" tubes. Each part of the antenna is supported in the vertice by one 1/2"x3" bolt, insulated from the tower, an
- /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-03/msg00569.html (7,521 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu