Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+New\s+Proposed\s+Texas\s+Tower\s+Regulation\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] New Proposed Texas Tower Regulation (score: 1)
Author: "L L bahr " <pulsarxp@embarqmail.com>
Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2015 12:55:48 -0500 (EST)
FYI Lee, w0vt http://www.legis.state.tx.us/BillLookup/Text.aspx?LegSess=84R&Bill=HB946 Please read and pass this to all Amateur Radio Operators who have towers. This COULD be detrimental to all of us
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-02/msg00120.html (9,233 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] New Proposed Texas Tower Regulation (score: 1)
Author: "Gene Smar" <ersmar@verizon.net>
Date: Sat, 07 Feb 2015 13:17:39 -0500
TT: First of all, I am not a lawyer, so Caveat Amateur. I found a definition of "curtilage" at http://thelawdictionary.org/curtilage/ . To my reading, it seems that the proposed Texas statute specifi
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-02/msg00121.html (11,410 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] New Proposed Texas Tower Regulation (score: 1)
Author: Kim Elmore <cw_de_n5op@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2015 12:30:54 -0600
This comes directly from wind observing towers for wind farm siting. They are all under 300' tell and do not subject to FAA obstruction marking requirements. These are erected essentially overnight a
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-02/msg00122.html (12,246 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] New Proposed Texas Tower Regulation (score: 1)
Author: "Mark Stennett" <Mark@stennett.com>
Date: Sat, 07 Feb 2015 12:39:57 -0600
https://oeaaa.faa.gov/oeaaa/external/gisTools/gisAction.jsp?action=showNoNoticeRequiredToolForm --Original Message-- From: Kim Elmore <cw_de_n5op@sbcglobal.net> To: L L bahr <pulsarxp@embarqmail.com>
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-02/msg00123.html (13,203 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] New Proposed Texas Tower Regulation (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Kennedy" <kennedyjp@cableone.net>
Date: Sat, 07 Feb 2015 16:28:13 -0500
We went through this drill in Idaho in 2013, and yes, it was prompted by the crop dusters. Contact one of your state representatives and have them introduce into the bill language that excludes amate
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-02/msg00124.html (11,606 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] New Proposed Texas Tower Regulation (score: 1)
Author: "Mark Stennett" <Mark@stennett.com>
Date: Sat, 07 Feb 2015 22:38:51 -0600
No tower is exempt from FAA siting requirements, regardless of height. You wouldn't put a 10 foot tower at the base of a runway, would you? All structures, permanent or temporary have to pass a numbe
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-02/msg00127.html (14,820 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] New Proposed Texas Tower Regulation (score: 1)
Author: "Roger (K8RI) on TT" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>
Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2015 06:18:05 -0500
The following makes it sound as if FAA approval is required for all antennas. It is not. If your antenna is less than 200' And not in an airport area you only need worry about any existing zoning req
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-02/msg00129.html (17,019 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu