- 1. [TowerTalk] New TV antennas (score: 1)
- Author: "Jim WB5OXQ inb Waco, TX" <wb5oxq@grandecom.net>
- Date: Sat, 16 May 2009 00:01:29 -0500
- Anybody know if a new line of TV antennas are comming out since channels 2-6 are not used anymore. smaller higher gain should now be possable with a managable size. __________________________________
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-05/msg00309.html (6,537 bytes)
- 2. Re: [TowerTalk] New TV antennas (score: 1)
- Author: "Dino Darling" <dino@kx6d.com>
- Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 23:20:58 -0700
- You don't need a new line of antennas. All you need is a UHF antenna. In some areas, the HD signals will still be transmitted on VHF. There are no "digital optimized" antennas...the antenna doesn't c
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-05/msg00310.html (8,165 bytes)
- 3. Re: [TowerTalk] New TV antennas (score: 1)
- Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
- Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 23:48:52 -0700
- Yes. Most antenna mfrs are building antennas designed for channels 7-13 plus UHF. It's getting hard to find an antenna that covers 2-6 or FM. One practical note: I'm roughly 45 miles from my local st
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-05/msg00311.html (7,725 bytes)
- 4. Re: [TowerTalk] New TV antennas (score: 1)
- Author: "Roger (K8RI)" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>
- Date: Sat, 16 May 2009 04:01:22 -0400
- Where did you get that idea? Even here in Michigan we will have at least two active digital stations on Ch 2. Nation wide I believe there will be on the order of 20-30. A quick search will show the l
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-05/msg00312.html (10,677 bytes)
- 5. Re: [TowerTalk] New TV antennas (score: 1)
- Author: "Dave Cook" <davepc2@netdave.com>
- Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 22:43:03 -0700
- Check out the products from www.channelmaster.com Basically, any HDTV antenna, by any manufacturer, is what you want. Basically, they're all UHF antennas. 73, Dave WA0TTN ____________________________
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-05/msg00313.html (8,312 bytes)
- 6. Re: [TowerTalk] New TV antennas (score: 1)
- Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
- Date: Sat, 16 May 2009 09:38:57 -0700
- That is not accurate. Most broadcasters are abondoning Ch 2-6 channels because, during the first years of DTV, they learned that the impulse noise in this frequency range seriously degrades DTV perfo
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-05/msg00314.html (9,162 bytes)
- 7. Re: [TowerTalk] New TV antennas (score: 1)
- Author: "Roger (K8RI)" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>
- Date: Sat, 16 May 2009 16:37:34 -0400
- That map is quite different from the FCC channel listing I looked at about a month ago. Although they do have channel 2 showing up in the Kalamazoo area. There was a table showing present, or rather
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-05/msg00324.html (8,559 bytes)
- 8. Re: [TowerTalk] New TV antennas (score: 1)
- Author: k7lxc@aol.com
- Date: Sat, 16 May 2009 18:13:32 -0400
- not used anymore. smaller higher gain should now be possable with a managable size. ?????????????? Oops - wrong reflector. I'm sure OTA tv antennas are discussed somewhere. ????????????? OTOH if you
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-05/msg00325.html (8,220 bytes)
- 9. Re: [TowerTalk] New TV antennas (score: 1)
- Author: Steve Maki <steveslists1@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 16 May 2009 18:22:01 -0400
- Power line noise is a big problem on low VHF digital, wherever you are. Steve K8LX _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing li
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-05/msg00326.html (8,038 bytes)
- 10. Re: [TowerTalk] New TV antennas (score: 1)
- Author: "wb0m@flashdog.us" <wb0m@flashdog.us>
- Date: Sat, 16 May 2009 19:33:46 -0500
- Here's a good site for TV reception/frequency info: www.tvfool.com 73, Jeff Beiermann WBØM Nebraska _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ Tow
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-05/msg00329.html (7,774 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu