Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+New\s+Tower\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+New\s+Tower\s*$/: 51 ]

Total 51 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] New Tower (score: 1): Author: jesser38@chorus.net (Jim Esser); Date: Thu, 1 Jul 1999 15:07:11 -0500; This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --=_NextPart_000_0047_01BEC3D3.65145660 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable After obtaining the app; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-07/msg00010.html (9,776 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] New Tower (score: 1): Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com); Date: Thu, 1 Jul 1999 16:18:43 EDT; Naw - pick and shovel. Takes a couple of hours. I'm pretty sure the rotator is mast-mounted on the top mast. You'll need a mast-mounting bracket. Hy-Gain and Yaesu both have them. Cheers, Steve K7LXC; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-07/msg00011.html (7,104 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] New Tower (score: 1): Author: N4CW@aol.com (N4CW@aol.com); Date: Thu, 1 Jul 1999 17:35:58 EDT; << how to dig a 3x3x4 foot hole. Post hole digger?? >> A lot depends on what you're digging into. The easiest is to get somebody with a backhoe...costs vary, but I recently had a hole dug in Maine fo; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-07/msg00013.html (7,876 bytes)
4. [TowerTalk] new tower (score: 1): Author: k5qf@camalott.com (Michael McLaughlin); Date: Tue, 21 Oct 1997 11:03:05 +0000; Well its almost cqww here and its look like all the work at my shack is going to pay off.I am putting up a 55 foot crankup tower and got the base poured last friday.the concrete contactor made a mist; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-10/msg00571.html (7,247 bytes)
5. [TowerTalk] new tower (score: 1): Author: dick@libelle.com (Dick Flanagan); Date: Tue, 21 Oct 1997 09:20:30 -0800; I think this might have come up a few months ago, but I don't recall anyone having a definitive answer. Can anyone come up with a way to calculate thousands-of-pounds-per-sack-of-concrete? If 6-sack; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-10/msg00581.html (7,555 bytes)
6. [TowerTalk] New Tower (score: 1): Author: DaveLeDuc@aol.com (DaveLeDuc@aol.com); Date: Mon, 15 Sep 1997 06:27:23 -0400 (EDT); I will be installing my 60 foot rohn 25g tower very soon. I'm fortunate enough to have the availability of a backhoe and backhoe operator to dig the holes. My question is how large should the hole be; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-09/msg00362.html (7,110 bytes)
7. [TowerTalk] New Tower (score: 1): Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com); Date: Mon, 15 Sep 1997 10:41:55 -0400 (EDT); According to the Rohn catalog (if you don't have one, they're five bucks from TOWER TECH), the base is 2x2x4 feet deep. It takes .70 yds of concrete and four 3/4" vertical pieces of rebar. The guy an; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-09/msg00372.html (7,691 bytes)
8. [TowerTalk] New Tower (score: 1): Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com); Date: Mon, 15 Sep 1997 12:31:55 -0400 (EDT); Oops! You are correct, sir. My faux pas. All TowerTalkians please note and correct. Or better yet, look it up. 73, Steve K7LXC -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html Submissions:; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-09/msg00378.html (7,189 bytes)
9. [TowerTalk] new tower (score: 1): Author: "Paul Hemby" <phemby@hotmail.com>; Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 17:26:49 -0400; I would like to install 170 feet of Rohn 45 tower. The problem is that the specs call for guy points to be 136 feet. My lot is only 170 feet wide which will give me about 96 feet on each guy point. I; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-07/msg00576.html (7,292 bytes)
10. Re: [TowerTalk] new tower (score: 1): Author: "David Robbins K1TTT" <k1ttt@arrl.net>; Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 21:51:51 -0000; The only answer possible on here... you need an engineer. One who really knows what he is doing with towers. David Robbins K1TTT e-mail: mailto:k1ttt@arrl.net web: http://www.k1ttt.net AR-Cluster nod; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-07/msg00578.html (8,302 bytes)
11. Re: [TowerTalk] new tower (score: 1): Author: "Rick Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>; Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 15:15:52 -0700 (PDT); Obvious solution is 4-way guying. The use of 4 guys reduces the 80% rule to 57%, or 96 feet. But 4 way guying also allows you to put the guys out at 120 feet. So you will be in very good shape with 4; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-07/msg00579.html (8,685 bytes)
12. Re: [TowerTalk] new tower (score: 1): Author: "David Robbins K1TTT" <k1ttt@arrl.net>; Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 22:54:02 -0000; Yeah, a 3 legged stool never wobbles... a 4 legged one always wobbles! David Robbins K1TTT e-mail: mailto:k1ttt@arrl.net web: http://www.k1ttt.net AR-Cluster node: 145.69MHz or telnet://dxc.k1ttt.net; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-07/msg00580.html (9,529 bytes)
13. Re: [TowerTalk] new tower (score: 1): Author: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>; Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 19:56:07 -0400; 1. What do you plan to put on it? 2. Id strongly suggest a pier pin base no matter what sort of guying. 3. I have 180' of 45G up 17 years and it has withstood hurricanes, northeasters, microbursts, s; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-07/msg00582.html (8,750 bytes)
14. Re: [TowerTalk] new tower (score: 1): Author: "Mark Robinson" <markrob@mindspring.com>; Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 20:00:19 -0400; What is the advantage of a pier pin base? 73's de Mark N1UK G3ZZM _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@cont; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-07/msg00583.html (10,301 bytes)
15. Re: [TowerTalk] new tower (score: 1): Author: "Rick Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>; Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 18:19:02 -0700 (PDT); I think your calculations assume the tower must be centered in the lot. If you offset it to the 1/3 point, you would have 128 feet for the guys. Probably obvious, but you don't know if you don't ask.; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-07/msg00587.html (9,041 bytes)
16. Re: [TowerTalk] new tower (score: 1): Author: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>; Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 21:34:21 -0400; It minimizes the tower twisting forces especially at the base. Recommended by Rohn. Especially advantageous with a tall tower with a big load; lets the guys do the work. Ive been on the top of my tow; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-07/msg00590.html (11,503 bytes)
17. [TowerTalk] new tower (score: 1): Author: <john@kk9a.com>; Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 21:45:55 -0400; No one will be able to answer your question without knowing the load you intend to put on the tower and without doing the engineering work. You definitely can have less than 80% guy anchor radius, ho; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-07/msg00591.html (7,462 bytes)
18. Re: [TowerTalk] new tower (score: 1): Author: <john@kk9a.com>; Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 22:57:46 -0400; I agree that the pier pin lets the guys do the work and it is the best base for large tower. I don't think the pier pin base will do anything to minimize tower twisting. The best way to stop the twis; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-07/msg00594.html (8,173 bytes)
19. Re: [TowerTalk] new tower (score: 1): Author: K7LXC@aol.com; Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2007 10:29:31 EDT; the specs call for guy points to be 136 feet. My lot is only 170 feet wide which will give me about 96 feet on each guy point. Is there anyway to elevate the guy points enough, such as using H beam t; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-07/msg00599.html (9,018 bytes)
20. Re: [TowerTalk] new tower (score: 1): Author: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>; Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2007 10:33:08 -0400; The tower will still move but it is not twisting as in winding up to a point of possible fracture. The commercial site over on the next hill had 140' of 45G with the base buried in concrete and a bun; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-07/msg00600.html (9,860 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3]