Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+New\s+Tower\s+Old\s+Base\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+New\s+Tower\s+Old\s+Base\s*$/: 27 ]

Total 27 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] New Tower Old Base (score: 1): Author: Richard Zalewski <dick.w7zr@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2011 15:54:35 -0700; I will be upgrading my tower and will be using my existing base. This will require drilling the existing concrete base and epoxing in some new bolts. I would be interested in exchanging some emails w; /archives//html/Towertalk/2011-02/msg00166.html (6,776 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] New Tower Old Base (score: 1): Author: Michael Goins <wmgoins@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2011 17:05:26 -0600; I can't imagine that being a good idea. The base that was original extends into the concrete via a welded cage or the attachment to other tower (which does the same thing) and is then bolted to the t; /archives//html/Towertalk/2011-02/msg00167.html (8,378 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] New Tower Old Base (score: 1): Author: EZ Rhino <ezrhino@fastmovers.biz>; Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2011 19:07:28 -0700; Keep the information on the list; I want to know more about this as well. A local here upgraded from a 50' to a 70' tower, and did this very thing. He used some kind of an epoxy to glue in the bolts.; /archives//html/Towertalk/2011-02/msg00172.html (8,419 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] New Tower Old Base (score: 1): Author: "Jim W7RY" <w7ry@inbox.com>; Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2011 20:27:40 -0800; What did you have? And what are you going to install? 73 Jim W7RY _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@cont; /archives//html/Towertalk/2011-02/msg00179.html (10,186 bytes)
5. Re: [TowerTalk] New Tower Old Base (score: 1): Author: Grant Saviers <grants2@pacbell.net>; Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2011 22:01:56 -0800; Look at the Simpson Strong Tie web site for lots of data. The permitted tension for epoxy anchors depends on a number of factors shown in the charts. http://www.simpsonanchors.com/catalog/adhesives/e; /archives//html/Towertalk/2011-02/msg00183.html (8,792 bytes)
6. Re: [TowerTalk] New Tower Old Base (score: 1): Author: Kevin Normoyle <knormoyle@surfnetusa.com>; Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2011 23:01:48 -0800; isn't this one of those things where you want to be using some numbers? I can't imagine that you want anecdotal info here on sizing. Like how much tension do you have withstand? Depends on your tower; /archives//html/Towertalk/2011-02/msg00184.html (9,919 bytes)
7. Re: [TowerTalk] New Tower Old Base (score: 1): Author: Robert Harmon <k6uj@pacbell.net>; Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2011 00:16:15 -0800; If it is guyed tower then epoxying in anchor bolts should be a good solution provided they are sized properly. If it is a self supporting tower it is a different ball game and it would be wise to hav; /archives//html/Towertalk/2011-02/msg00185.html (10,368 bytes)
8. Re: [TowerTalk] New Tower Old Base (score: 1): Author: "Jim W7RY" <w7ry@inbox.com>; Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2011 07:31:38 -0800; If its a guyed tower, you don't need any bolts. Take a look at the Rohn 25, 45 and 55 pier pins. A simple single pin in the center of the base plate is all that is required. Take a look at the Rohn i; /archives//html/Towertalk/2011-02/msg00192.html (12,525 bytes)
9. Re: [TowerTalk] New Tower Old Base (score: 1): Author: K7LXC@aol.com; Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2011 11:57:00 EST; will require drilling the existing concrete base and epoxing in some new bolts. I would be interested in exchanging some emails with someone who has done this. This is covered in my UP THE TOWER book; /archives//html/Towertalk/2011-02/msg00195.html (9,824 bytes)
10. Re: [TowerTalk] New Tower Old Base (score: 1): Author: K7LXC@aol.com; Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2011 12:03:49 EST; Well, it is and contractors do this kind of thing everyday (assuming the suitability of the existing concrete). or the attachment to other tower (which does the same thing) and is then bolted to the; /archives//html/Towertalk/2011-02/msg00196.html (9,598 bytes)
11. Re: [TowerTalk] New Tower Old Base (score: 1): Author: Michael Goins <wmgoins@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2011 11:12:55 -0600; Even if unguyed, Steve? Surely not. Mike, k5wmg Pipe Creek, Texas A thousand words a day. Five days a week. For life. * * * * _______________________________________________ _________________________; /archives//html/Towertalk/2011-02/msg00197.html (10,898 bytes)
12. Re: [TowerTalk] New Tower Old Base (score: 1): Author: Robert Harmon <k6uj@pacbell.net>; Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2011 09:21:40 -0800; I posted this earlier but it didn't make it through, here goes again. If it is guyed tower then epoxying in anchor bolts should be a good solution provided they are sized properly. If it is a self su; /archives//html/Towertalk/2011-02/msg00198.html (12,458 bytes)
13. Re: [TowerTalk] New Tower Old Base (score: 1): Author: KJ6Y@aol.com; Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2011 12:28:48 EST; The first time I needed to do this, I contacted Hilti Products and talked to their engineers. Sent them a copy of the engineering calcs from US Tower and they came back with the necessary product nee; /archives//html/Towertalk/2011-02/msg00199.html (9,229 bytes)
14. Re: [TowerTalk] New Tower Old Base (score: 1): Author: K7LXC@aol.com; Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2011 12:39:06 EST; Of course. Works great. Cheers, Steve K7LXC TWOER TECH _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com; /archives//html/Towertalk/2011-02/msg00200.html (7,901 bytes)
15. Re: [TowerTalk] New Tower Old Base (score: 1): Author: Grant Saviers <grants2@pacbell.net>; Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2011 10:43:50 -0800; In addition to blowing out the dust, a good steel or brass brush should be used to clean the compacted dust from the barrel of the hole after drilling. Blow out the hole, brush vigorously, blow out,; /archives//html/Towertalk/2011-02/msg00201.html (11,059 bytes)
16. Re: [TowerTalk] New Tower Old Base (score: 1): Author: "Andy GD0TEP" <andy@gd0tep.com>; Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2011 13:32:24 -0800; I know of one local here who change the type of tower from a fixed post to one that needed a base plate. He cast a small block of concrete right next to the original block, and in the new bit he incl; /archives//html/Towertalk/2011-02/msg00204.html (10,746 bytes)
17. Re: [TowerTalk] New Tower Old Base (score: 1): Author: "Tod - ID" <tod@k0to.us>; Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2011 16:04:23 -0600; I have been following this thread since it started. In 2009 I was forced to replace a 'wind altered' tower with a new one. I decided to try to use the existing base for the new tower which was going; /archives//html/Towertalk/2011-02/msg00205.html (10,789 bytes)
18. Re: [TowerTalk] New Tower Old Base (score: 1): Author: "John Lemay" <john@carltonhouse.eclipse.co.uk>; Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 04:39:20 -0800; About 15 years ago, I purchased a larger crank-up mast with a new base plate. Of course, the original holding down bolts were not in the right place for the new base. The old ones were cut off flush.; /archives//html/Towertalk/2011-02/msg00210.html (12,608 bytes)
19. Re: [TowerTalk] New Tower Old Base (score: 1): Author: pc2a@pi4cc.nl; Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 14:53:20 +0100; Richard Zalewski schreef: Hi Not a old tower base, but an old bunker as base and a 15 meter feestanding tower. http://www.pi4cc.nl/tech-info/anker/ Peter PC2A ________________________________________; /archives//html/Towertalk/2011-02/msg00211.html (9,419 bytes)
20. Re: [TowerTalk] New Tower Old Base (score: 1): Author: Paul_group <paul_group@greenrover.demon.co.uk>; Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 14:31:26 +0000; Been using them for years, holding up masts on top of buildings, railway overhead line gantries and all manner of structures. Take professional advice on the correct type to use - hilti are a very go; /archives//html/Towertalk/2011-02/msg00212.html (10,116 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]