- 1. [TowerTalk] No Explanation (score: 1)
- Author: "Bill" <w7vp@comcast.net>
- Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2006 07:30:25 -0700
- Tor N4OGW Stated "Also note that the phasing for the cardioid array shown in that report is incorrect. You can't just add a "delay" line of 1/4 wavelength to get 90 degree phasing." and "Two vertical
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-04/msg00133.html (6,996 bytes)
- 2. Re: [TowerTalk] No Explanation (score: 1)
- Author: Don Havlicek <n8de@thepoint.net>
- Date: Thu, 06 Apr 2006 10:58:00 -0400
- And for me. Don N8DE _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailma
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-04/msg00135.html (7,920 bytes)
- 3. Re: [TowerTalk] No Explanation (score: 1)
- Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
- Date: Thu, 06 Apr 2006 10:55:15 -0700
- There's some examples of this in the ARRL antenna book, with lots of examples of what kind of pattern you get with "causually designed feed networks". Forward gain isn't much affected, but the depth
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-04/msg00140.html (8,746 bytes)
- 4. Re: [TowerTalk] No Explanation (score: 1)
- Author: <rt_clay@bellsouth.net>
- Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2006 14:32:59 -0400
- You can find a detailed discussion in the ARRL Antenna book, or better in ON4UN's book. The difference in the length of the two feedlines is not 90 deg because of coupling between the verticals. Thi
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-04/msg00141.html (8,174 bytes)
- 5. Re: [TowerTalk] No Explanation (score: 1)
- Author: <rt_clay@bellsouth.net>
- Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2006 14:39:51 -0400
- See also: http://www.eznec.com/Amateur/Articles/Simpfeed.pdf Tor N4OGW _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-04/msg00142.html (7,052 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu