- 1. [TowerTalk] No Subject in the Subject (score: 1)
- Author: TOMK5RC@aol.com (TOMK5RC@aol.com)
- Date: Tue, 20 Oct 1998 08:54:54 EDT
- There's a bad trend developing of not including the subject of your post. Please, guys, I get over 100 e-mails a day. Common courtesy is to put a subject so they can be sorted in priority. Thanks! To
- /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-10/msg00697.html (7,103 bytes)
- 2. [TowerTalk] No Subject in the Subject (score: 1)
- Author: k2av@qsl.net (Guy Olinger, K2AV)
- Date: Tue, 20 Oct 1998 14:54:44 GMT
- I'm one of those. I apologize. I was trying to edit and resend a prior post that was missing an address. In my trying to get it to resend edited (which it wouldn't), it went out unedited without a su
- /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-10/msg00709.html (8,560 bytes)
- 3. [TowerTalk] No Subject in the Subject (score: 1)
- Author: bragassa@hal-pc.org (Mike Bragassa)
- Date: Wed, 21 Oct 1998 19:37:44 +0400 (WSU DST)
- 73 de Mike R3/K5UO Russia: bragassa@glasnet.ru USA: bragassa@hal-pc.org -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com Administrative requests: tower
- /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-10/msg00774.html (7,378 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu