Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Nolux\s+or\s+not\-to\-nolux\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Nolux or not-to-nolux (score: 1)
Author: "Ford Peterson" <ford@cmgate.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2005 00:38:55 -0500
That is the question. I'm putting up an elevated 80M vertical using old Heights tower sections. I intend to load the thing on 80M and want good conductivity in the joints of the tower. There are many
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-07/msg00033.html (6,978 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] Nolux or not-to-nolux (score: 1)
Author: "JC Smith" <jc-smith@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2005 01:43:21 -0700
Butternut (the vertical, not the coffee) had some stuff called Butter-its-not (or something like that) that was specifically for that purpose. I have purchased it in the past from ham vendors. The st
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-07/msg00034.html (9,268 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] Nolux or not-to-nolux (score: 1)
Author: Don Havlicek <n8de@thepoint.net>
Date: Mon, 04 Jul 2005 08:10:28 -0400
Lowe's and Home Depot sell No-Alox. I use it between sections of my 80m aluminum tower vertical. Just remember to clean the INSIDE of the section into which the other section will be inserted. You ca
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-07/msg00035.html (8,923 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] Nolux or not-to-nolux (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Gehring" <steveg@mtaonline.net>
Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2005 03:25:30 -0800
Any of the mentioned products should work fine for antenna joints. In the past I've used the Ox-Gard product with success. Ox-Gard should be available in the stores mentioned below. In fact, my "ham"
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-07/msg00038.html (10,116 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] Nolux or not-to-nolux (score: 1)
Author: "K3GM" <k3gm_qrp@verizon.net>
Date: Mon, 04 Jul 2005 14:17:30 -0400
As an example of long term testing. I recently dug (and I mean dug) a 10 meter yagi out from under a deep pile of leaves turned mulch in the corner of my back yard. It had been there since 1986, elem
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-07/msg00052.html (9,013 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] Nolux or not-to-nolux (score: 1)
Author: "David Robbins K1TTT" <k1ttt@arrl.net>
Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2005 22:19:23 -0000
At the request of someone who wanted to make a case about using that gunk I recently dug out some old elements that had been assembled and in the air for probably 15 years. He could not get a voltage
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-07/msg00053.html (10,928 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] Nolux or not-to-nolux (score: 1)
Author: "Keith Dutson" <kdutson@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2005 20:44:17 -0500
Assuming the tower sections bolt together, good conductivity should not depend on the lubricant used. I use plain axle grease when assembling Rohn sections. NoAlOx is used mainly in aluminum antenna
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-07/msg00056.html (9,560 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu