- 1. [TowerTalk] Non-traditional antenna designs (score: 1)
- Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com)
- Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2002 14:47:46 EST
- I'm a huge skeptic of the performance of 'new', non-traditional antenna designs. I went to the Hex website and founds loads of anecodotal information and lots of 'smoke and mirrors' about how it's an
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-01/msg00617.html (9,771 bytes)
- 2. [TowerTalk] Non-traditional antenna designs (score: 1)
- Author: Kenneth Hirschberg" <info@cal-av.com (Kenneth Hirschberg)
- Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2002 13:34:54 -0700
- Steve and all - Check out the antennas on the CAL-AV web site, www.cal-av.com/antennas.html They are fully specified. 73, Ken President, CAL-AV w8ji@akorn.net antenna information met information. is
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-01/msg00621.html (11,719 bytes)
- 3. [TowerTalk] Non-traditional antenna designs (score: 1)
- Author: jreisert@jlc.net (Joe Reisert)
- Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2002 17:50:32 -0500
- Steve Etal, Mike at Traffie Technology made me a specially built mono-band Hex beam to test at my QTH for 40 meters. It has been up about 3 years. It is optimized for the CW portion of 40 meters and
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-01/msg00624.html (12,210 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu