Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Not\s+QUITE\s+a\s+tower\s*$/: 14 ]

Total 14 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Not QUITE a tower (score: 1)
Author: Charlie Gallo <Charlie@TheGallos.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 17:04:42 -0400
Not sure if there is an antenna list, but... Any idea how close to salt water a vertical dipole array has to be to work well? 15-20 ft to the side and 5 ft up close enough? -- 73 de KG2V For the Chil
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-10/msg00174.html (7,679 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] Not QUITE a tower (score: 1)
Author: Dan Zimmerman N3OX <n3ox@n3ox.net>
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 17:10:41 -0400
Some info on this here: http://www.k2kw.com/verticals/tests.html 73 Dan _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTal
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-10/msg00175.html (7,532 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] Not QUITE a tower (score: 1)
Author: Bob Nielsen <n7xy@clearwire.net>
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 14:55:11 -0700
In addition to Towertalk, I am aware of two antenna lists: antennaware@contesting.com antennas@mailman.qth.net I don't have any quantitative data, but suspect that at such a distance you would defini
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-10/msg00176.html (8,266 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] Not QUITE a tower (score: 1)
Author: Jack Brindle <jackbrindle@earthlink.net>
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 15:07:56 -0700
_______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-10/msg00177.html (10,251 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] Not QUITE a tower (score: 1)
Author: Jack Brindle <jackbrindle@earthlink.net>
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 15:09:15 -0700
My apologies for that last email. While it was true, I hit the wrong button and it was NOT supposed to be sent. Jack Brindle, W6FB _______________________________________________ ____________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-10/msg00178.html (10,135 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] Not QUITE a tower (score: 1)
Author: Stuart Browne <stuartpbrowne@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 17:18:28 -0500
Check out the on air performance of KH6TE using an end-fed Zepp Par antenna on a Kanga Pole 20' from the waters edge on Kailua, Beach (windward Oahu)...they put out a 59+20 signal here into XE1.They
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-10/msg00180.html (11,126 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] Not QUITE a tower (score: 1)
Author: "Mark Beckwith" <n5ot@n5ot.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 17:52:41 -0500
I'm pretty sure the exhaustive series in the NCJ stated the benefit as a function of distance from the water expressed in wavelength, i.e. it's a function of frequency. Zero distance is best, and it
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-10/msg00184.html (7,484 bytes)

8. Re: [TowerTalk] Not QUITE a tower (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 19:05:56 -0400
It's an interesting subject. See "Lesson #7" in the first link below for some guidance. http://pages.prodigy.net/k2kw/learning.html http://www.k2kw.com/verticals/tests.html The other question I have
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-10/msg00185.html (9,564 bytes)

9. Re: [TowerTalk] Not QUITE a tower (score: 1)
Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 16:22:50 -0700
I have to run an errand and can't check it now myself, but doesn't EZNEC allow you to define two different ground zones (radial distances from center)? If so, you should be able to compare the result
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-10/msg00186.html (10,200 bytes)

10. Re: [TowerTalk] Not QUITE a tower (score: 1)
Author: Charlie Gallo <Charlie@TheGallos.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 19:27:15 -0400
I figured it's some function of wavelength. Right mow I'm extremely antenna limited, but can park oh, 10-15 ft from a salt water bay, with the water about 5 ft down on a seawall - setting up a nice "
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-10/msg00187.html (9,196 bytes)

11. Re: [TowerTalk] Not QUITE a tower (score: 1)
Author: <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 20:45:55 -0400
TowerTalk is for discussion of tower and HF antenna construction topics so I think that your post is relevant. That distance should be sufficient for pseudo-Brewster enhancement for at least some of
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-10/msg00189.html (8,189 bytes)

12. Re: [TowerTalk] Not QUITE a tower (score: 1)
Author: Charlie Gallo <Charlie@TheGallos.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 20:58:07 -0400
I'm hoping to run at 20m - basically, I'm extremely limited on antennas here at home, but I can go down to the local shoreline(s) and fairly easily put up a 2 or 3 element 20m VDA for a "lunchtime" a
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-10/msg00190.html (9,334 bytes)

13. Re: [TowerTalk] Not QUITE a tower (score: 1)
Author: Stuart Browne <stuartpbrowne@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 22:23:03 -0500
"The Polynesian Special" Take three Kanga fiberglass push-up masts and a 20 m PAR end-fed Zepp antenna. Place the driven element (the center mast) and hang the Zepp taped to the pole. The Director po
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-10/msg00193.html (10,935 bytes)

14. Re: [TowerTalk] Not QUITE a tower (score: 1)
Author: Stuart Browne <stuartpbrowne@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 23:20:37 -0500
....oops try Reflector =34', Director = 32' , its late here. _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contestin
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-10/msg00194.html (11,647 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 14
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu