Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Now\s+What\?\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Now What? (score: 1)
Author: no6x@inreach.com (Mike)
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 1998 03:36:37 +0000
I have read the many posts regarding "to pour or not to pour?" I know have questions about my origional Idea. Being a renter and a Ham I am a bit challenged. I am planning a tower install sometime th
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-04/msg00355.html (9,073 bytes)

2. [TowerTalk] Now What? (score: 1)
Author: twoway@scoden.ma.ultranet.com (Scott Bullock)
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 1998 05:45:56 -0400
ahh, this is an easy one..... Go to the nearest Rohn engineering book available, open it, look at it and study it, see if it says install any towers in rocks, then close it, and hit yourself over the
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-04/msg00360.html (10,540 bytes)

3. [TowerTalk] Now What? (score: 1)
Author: rudder1@ibm.net (Malcolm Clark)
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 1998 09:48:30 +0000
[snip] [snip] The maximums for freestanding 25G and 45G are: 25G 40' 1.5 sfwl @70 mph (2.4 yds concrete) 45G 45' 2.3 sfwl @70 mph (4.1 yds concrete) The base of a freestanding tower has to be imbedde
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-04/msg00366.html (9,135 bytes)

4. [TowerTalk] Now What? (score: 1)
Author: seay@alaska.net (Del Seay)
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 1998 06:06:19 -0800
A suitable base for Rohn 25G & 45G to replace concrete, is a section of culvert 6" larger in diameter than the tower section, and set 5 ' in the earth. The tower section is set in, with a layer of sm
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-04/msg00369.html (10,712 bytes)

5. [TowerTalk] Now What? (score: 1)
Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC)
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 1998 10:38:43 EDT
The question is not whether "to pour or not to pour", it's do I follow the Rohn specs or do I hip-pocket engineer it? The LXC Prime Directive is "DO what the manufacturer says". I don't recall any me
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-04/msg00373.html (10,832 bytes)

6. [TowerTalk] Now What? (score: 1)
Author: rudder1@ibm.net (Malcolm Clark)
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 1998 11:45:18 +0000
[snip] What happened to the LXC prime directive???? The Rohn specs for concrete bases for bracketed, freestanding, and guyed towers call for at least four inches of the base to be above grade. They a
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-04/msg00374.html (8,875 bytes)

7. [TowerTalk] Now What? (score: 1)
Author: w2xx@cloud9.net (J.P. Kleinhaus)
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 1998 11:41:29 -0400
The idea of this sounds scary as hell to me.... W2XX -- == J.P. Kleinhaus, W2XX (fdba AA2DU) E-mail: w2xx@cloud9.net As we say in the software business: "You are hosed." == -- FAQ on WWW: http://www
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-04/msg00375.html (8,113 bytes)

8. Re[2]: [TowerTalk] Now What? (score: 1)
Author: GORDENH1@westat.com (GORDENH1)
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 1998 12:22:49 -0400
--IMA.Boundary.9001752980 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Description: cc:Mail note part I think that everybody is forgetting that when you pour a b
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-04/msg00376.html (11,873 bytes)

9. Re[3]: [TowerTalk] Now What? (score: 1)
Author: GORDENH1@westat.com (GORDENH1)
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 1998 12:37:08 -0400
Another thought: If you are really concerned about the Landlords finding the remains of your tower, (do they come by and see the tower in the first place?), then you might want to buy a couple of rai
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-04/msg00377.html (10,835 bytes)

10. [TowerTalk] Now What? (score: 1)
Author: brucecom@shore.intercom.net (James D. Bruce)
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 1998 21:29:22 -0400
On installing towers the least expensive way now may not be the least expensive overall. It may come back to haunt you. Remember, we live in a litigious society so if for some reason it should fail,
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-04/msg00392.html (9,139 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu