Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+OCF\s+Windom\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+OCF\s+Windom\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] OCF Windom (score: 1): Author: Tom Osborne <w7why@frontier.com>; Date: Sun, 28 Aug 2016 09:53:52 -0700; Some OT's will remember the single wire fed, Windom antenna that was popular back in the day. There were a lot of these on the air. The Windom back then was a wire around 135 feet long, fed with a si; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-08/msg00321.html (6,991 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] OCF Windom (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Sun, 28 Aug 2016 10:52:03 -0700; The Windom back then was a wire around 135 feet long, fed with a single wire, around 1/3 of the way from the end. What I am wondering is, is this actually a horizontal type antenna, fed with single w; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-08/msg00322.html (9,684 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] OCF Windom (score: 1): Author: "Mark Lunday" <wd4elg@triad.rr.com>; Date: Sun, 28 Aug 2016 15:12:18 -0400; Tom My Elmer taught me that there is some confusion on these. There are actually two types of antennas: the OCF antenna (sometimes called the OCF dipole) and the Windom. The OCF antenna is normally f; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-08/msg00328.html (8,854 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] OCF Windom (score: 1): Author: Edward McCann via TowerTalk <towertalk@contesting.com>; Date: Sun, 28 Aug 2016 14:22:23 -0700; See the following attachment, then go to QST archives for the original article September 1929 article and become enlightened. 73, Ed McCann AG6CX https://www.iz3mez.it/wp-content/library/appunti/W4RN; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-08/msg00332.html (8,972 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]