- 1. [TowerTalk] OT: Ham Law (score: 1)
- Author: Alan Beagley <AB2OS@att.net>
- Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2004 17:51:00 -0400
- I've seen references to a Ham Law list, but I can't find it. I found an old (many years old) message purporting to tell how to subscribe, but that address seems to be invalid. Alan AB2OS ____________
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-04/msg00525.html (6,647 bytes)
- 2. Re: [TowerTalk] OT: Ham Law (score: 1)
- Author: K4SB <k4sb@bellsouth.net>
- Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2004 22:25:57 +0000
- -- Goodness, I think that reflector went up in smoke at least 5 years ago. 73 Ed _______________________________________________ See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-04/msg00528.html (7,375 bytes)
- 3. Re: [TowerTalk] OT: Ham Law (score: 1)
- Author: "WW3S" <ww3s@zoominternet.net>
- Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2004 18:47:17 -0400
- Ham-Law is still active: The Ham-Law Mailing List. This list is for discussion and does not purport to give legal advice. Submissions: ham-law@altlaw.com Subscribe and unsubscribe: ham-law-request@al
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-04/msg00532.html (8,500 bytes)
- 4. Re: [TowerTalk] OT: Ham Law (score: 1)
- Author: K7LXC@aol.com
- Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2004 19:39:47 EDT
- Here's the info: The Ham-Law Mailing List. This list is for discussion and does not purport to give legal advice. Submissions: ham-law@altlaw.com Subscribe and unsubscribe: ham-law-request@altlaw.com
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-04/msg00533.html (7,671 bytes)
- 5. Re: [TowerTalk] OT: Ham Law (score: 1)
- Author: "Alan C. Zack" <k7acz@cox.net>
- Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2004 17:19:39 -0700
- Negative. Please note: "Please send your subscribe request to ham-law-request@altlaw.com." You put your request (subscribe or unsubscribe, at least) in the body of the e-mail. -- ____________________
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-04/msg00538.html (9,032 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu