Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+OT\:Satellite\s+Internet\s+\-\s+Results\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+OT\:Satellite\s+Internet\s+\-\s+Results\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] OT:Satellite Internet - Results (score: 1): Author: Dan Bookwalter <n8dcj@yahoo.com>; Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2010 09:16:13 -0700 (PDT); Well i sort of expected these results .... the general consensus is as follows: Hughes is bad Hughes is good WildBlue is bad WildBlue is good There was some encouraging comments regarding using Cell; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-08/msg00549.html (7,784 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] OT:Satellite Internet - Results (score: 1): Author: Adam Shirley WJ4X <wj4x@amsat.org>; Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2010 12:43:30 -0400; I use a VZW wireless card for internet when out and about, it worked great at Field Day. This might be the most practical option if you have cell service. ____________________________________________; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-08/msg00551.html (8,308 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] OT:Satellite Internet - Results (score: 1): Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2010 10:20:43 -0700; If you've got a lot of trees, don't count on getting much range from cell phones. I live in a redwood forest, and NO cell phones work up here. Loss in trees increases with frequency. Heck -- I can't; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-08/msg00555.html (7,606 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] OT:Satellite Internet - Results (score: 1): Author: Hector Garcia XE2K <j_hector_garcia@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2010 11:20:49 -0700 (PDT); Dan If you have a tower and your ISP need to have more coverage you can lease your tower or at least an space for that ISP ,he can install a back haul and make a multipoint (access point ) in that ca; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-08/msg00560.html (9,223 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]