Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+OTQ\s+\-\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+OTQ\s+\-\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] OTQ - (score: 1): Author: "Its from Onion" <aredandgold@msn.com>; Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2010 18:00:59 -0500; Hey guys, I know this is a bit off topic but your learned thoughts please. EquipmentRohn 25 50 feet high with house bracket at 28 feet M2 40m 3 element survivor beam twisted with a Ham IV DOM mast 18; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-08/msg00251.html (7,859 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] OTQ - (score: 1): Author: Cqtestk4xs@aol.com; Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2010 19:18:25 EDT; As it is...an accident waiting to happen. Adding anything will make it worse. I hope it is bracketed to your shed or barn and not your house. Check the Rohn catalogue on line to confim this. Bill KH7; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-08/msg00252.html (6,802 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] OTQ - (score: 1): Author: "Mark Robinson" <markrob@mindspring.com>; Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2010 19:37:29 -0400; Why don't you put a 2 antenna switch box near the top of the tower and run one coax down and to the shack. You can even put the DC down the coax to switch the relay box if you don't want to run a DC; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-08/msg00255.html (9,342 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] OTQ - (score: 1): Author: "Rex Lint" <rex@lint.mv.com>; Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2010 20:34:06 -0400; It's better at the bottom of the tower - at least at 2am in the next dx contest... -Rex K1HI Rex Lint Merrimack, NH WWW.QRZ.COM/db/k1hi Why don't you put a 2 antenna switch box near the; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-08/msg00256.html (10,769 bytes)
5. Re: [TowerTalk] OTQ - (score: 1): Author: <john@kk9a.com>; Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2010 21:25:08 -0400; I cannot imagine anyone recommending adding another 6 sq ft of windload 9 feet above your existing antenna system and I hope that you at least have guy wires at the top. You may have some interaction; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-08/msg00258.html (8,513 bytes)
6. Re: [TowerTalk] OTQ - (score: 1): Author: "Roger (K8RI)" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>; Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2010 21:53:54 -0400; Too vulnerable to lightning, at least around here. I decided to keep all remote switches below the first set of guys which is just about right for the feed to the half wave slopers. 73 Roger (K8RI) _; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-08/msg00259.html (10,617 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]