Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+OWAs\s+or\s+Fans\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+OWAs\s+or\s+Fans\?\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] OWAs or Fans? (score: 1): Author: "Roger (K8RI) on TT" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>; Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2016 02:10:21 -0400; I have several center fed, half wave sloping dipoles for 80 and 40.. I'm debating on putting up several 80 meter OWAs, or just making the the Fans for 80 and 40. On 40, I can get away with RG8X at th; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-06/msg00206.html (8,724 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] OWAs or Fans? (score: 1): Author: "Jim Thomson" <jim.thom@telus.net>; Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2016 08:44:50 -0700; I have several center fed, half wave sloping dipoles for 80 and 40.. I'm debating on putting up several 80 meter OWAs, or just making the the Fans for 80 and 40. On 40, I can get away with RG8X at th; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-06/msg00209.html (10,888 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] OWAs or Fans? (score: 1): Author: "Roger (K8RI) on TT" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>; Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2016 20:32:22 -0400; 75/80 meter slopers are very different than those on 40 and have a much greater imbalance. The reason why I'm considering so many cores is experience with a half wave, center fed, 80 meter fan which; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-06/msg00213.html (18,784 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] OWAs or Fans? (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2016 19:58:21 -0700; On Wed,6/15/2016 5:32 PM, Roger (K8RI) on TT wrote: With that set up, it worked well at 200 W, but as I increased the power, around 1 KW (maybe a little less) every LED in the system lit up. Instead; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-06/msg00215.html (9,526 bytes)
5. Re: [TowerTalk] OWAs or Fans? (score: 1): Author: "Roger (K8RI) on TT" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>; Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2016 01:19:35 -0400; Already looked at it. I hate to say it but I'm anti open wire feeders. Hate 'em with a passion. Every time I've been near one it's caused trouble. I much prefer coax and a good choke to get rid of co; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-06/msg00216.html (11,361 bytes)
6. Re: [TowerTalk] OWAs or Fans? (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2016 22:36:59 -0700; Are you sure you looked at my links? There are no open wire feeders there. The chokes are wound with a tightly spaced pair of either THHN or enameled #12. By tight, I mean touching. They are inserted; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-06/msg00217.html (8,324 bytes)
7. Re: [TowerTalk] OWAs or Fans? (score: 1): Author: "Roger (K8RI) on TT" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>; Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2016 04:16:55 -0400; I may have misunderstood and I probably need to down load it to this computer as the monitor quit on the one "I think" has it. Down loading is a whale of a lot faster than fixing that monitor. I stil; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-06/msg00218.html (9,393 bytes)
8. [TowerTalk] OWAs or Fans? (score: 1): Author: "Jim Thomson" <jim.thom@telus.net>; Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2016 06:35:36 -0700; 75/80 meter slopers are very different than those on 40 and have a much greater imbalance. The reason why I'm considering so many cores is experience with a half wave, center fed, 80 meter fan which; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-06/msg00219.html (11,358 bytes)
9. Re: [TowerTalk] OWAs or Fans? (score: 1): Author: "Roger (K8RI) on TT" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>; Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2016 19:21:07 -0400; As I stated in the main post and later, just the 5 80/40 fan dipoles. I used the 160 half sloper as a distance example, but neglected to say it's no longer in use. The 80 and 40 meter dipoles are one; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-06/msg00246.html (14,142 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]