Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Our\s+club\'s\s+\(W8UM\)\s+new\s+tower\s+and\s+antennas\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Our club's (W8UM) new tower and antennas (score: 1)
Author: "Christopher J Galbraith" <cgalbrai@umich.edu>
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 12:14:29 -0700
Gang, For your enjoyment, here are some action shots of our new W8UM roof-top tower installation from 7/30/07. It is a 40 ft Rohn 55G tower on top of the 60 ft tall Electrical Engineering and Compute
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-08/msg00493.html (9,102 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] Our club's (W8UM) new tower and antennas (score: 1)
Author: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 15:50:30 -0400
How come the extra weight of 55G when 45G or even 25G would suffice for that small load. Ive been involved in several roof top installs at commercial/industrial sites and roof loading weight was alwa
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-08/msg00494.html (10,272 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] Our club's (W8UM) new tower and antennas (score: 1)
Author: kr7x@comcast.net
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 20:17:16 +0000
Carl and TT: The dead load of the tower section for the 40' is a minor factor in this case. The max vertical load comes from the vertical guy force vectors not the weight of the tower in this case. 4
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-08/msg00496.html (12,451 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] Our club's (W8UM) new tower and antennas (score: 1)
Author: "Christopher J Galbraith" <cgalbrai@umich.edu>
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 13:14:41 -0700
Hi Carl, In a nutshell, we went with 55G for extra tower capacity and a safety factor. With the icing and wind conditions we had to meet with our proposed antennas at this height above grade, 55G had
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-08/msg00499.html (12,115 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] Our club's (W8UM) new tower and antennas (score: 1)
Author: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 17:08:45 -0400
Thanks for the details Chris. That roof must be a bit better constructed than some of the industrial buildings Ive installed on. I left the calculations to the building owners consultants but structu
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-08/msg00500.html (14,476 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] Our club's (W8UM) new tower and antennas (score: 1)
Author: "Patrick Barkey" <n9rvee@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 15:59:30 -0600
Hey, you're not supposed to be able to afford KC1XX if you are struggling college students! Climbing towers is part of your education, no? So is climbing all over the old EE building, climbing the ol
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-08/msg00501.html (7,972 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] Our club's (W8UM) new tower and antennas (score: 1)
Author: "Chet Moore" <ChetMoore@cox.net>
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 21:03:12 -0400
Looks like youse guys will be able to conduct some right powerful and lengthy rag chewz !! 73 N4FX -- Original Message -- From: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com> To: "Christopher J Galbraith" <cgalbra
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-08/msg00509.html (12,996 bytes)

8. Re: [TowerTalk] Our club's (W8UM) new tower and antennas (score: 1)
Author: "Keith Dutson" <kdutson@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 20:31:32 -0500
A thing of beauty! Congrats. What is the make of the weather instrument cluster? Thanks. 73, Keith NM5G --Original Message-- From: towertalk-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:towertalk-bounces@contestin
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-08/msg00510.html (10,557 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu