Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+PVC\s+\&\s+Losses\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+PVC\s+\&\s+Losses\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] PVC & Losses (score: 1): Author: n3rs@cynet.net (R. Sigismonti); Date: Sat, 3 Jul 1999 22:50:55 -0400; Wonder if anyone could comment on the use of 4" OD PVC Tubing as a form for a loading coil that will be used in an above ground shortened radial system on each element of a 4-SQUARE? Should I hunt ar; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-07/msg00049.html (7,185 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] PVC & Losses (score: 1): Author: jamesd1@flash.net (James R. Duffey); Date: Sun, 04 Jul 1999 09:22:29 -0600; Sig - In reply to your question: "Wonder if anyone could comment on the use of 4" OD PVC Tubing as a form for a loading coil that will be used in an above ground shortened radial system on each eleme; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-07/msg00053.html (9,031 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] PVC & Losses (score: 1): Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Sun, 4 Jul 1999 12:12:50 -0400; Hi Sig, Since a coil loaded elevated radial system is pretty inefficient anyway, I don't think the loss of Q caused by using PVC would hurt much anyway. If the system had reasonably high efficiency,; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-07/msg00055.html (7,698 bytes)
4. [TowerTalk] PVC & Losses (score: 1): Author: basalop@gte.net (Jim Berry); Date: Sun, 4 Jul 1999 18:18:56 -0700; Hello Sig, Might I suggest wrapping number 10 aluminum wire around a form of some kind and then removing the form. Number 10 aluminum wire is quite cheap. Is actually quite self supporting. I got thi; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-07/msg00067.html (7,573 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]