Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Parallel\s+conduits\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Parallel\s+conduits\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Parallel conduits (score: 1): Author: rodbrink@montereybay.com (Rod Brink); Date: Thu, 29 Jul 1999 09:59:55 -0700; What are the collective thoughts about burying two PVC conduits in parallel in the same trench, one carrying antenna coax and the other carrying 115VAC for operating a remote antenna tuner? For sure,; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-07/msg00509.html (7,822 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] Parallel conduits (score: 1): Author: k9fd@htc.net (Merv Schweigert); Date: Thu, 29 Jul 1999 13:10:17 -0500; Not a problem here, have both parallel conduits and 110 ran in one with the coax, no problems on receive even with beverage antennas. Just use good shielded coax, decouple you receiving feedlines on; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-07/msg00512.html (8,625 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] Parallel conduits (score: 1): Author: Jim" <jdc@ieway.com (Jim); Date: Thu, 29 Jul 1999 14:48:25 -0700; There is a NEC (National Electric Code) specification for separation of conduits that carry different signals, I.e. power, telephone, low voltage control circuits, etc. As I remember, the distance is; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-07/msg00514.html (10,079 bytes)
4. [TowerTalk] Parallel conduits (score: 1): Author: k9fd@htc.net (Merv Schweigert); Date: Thu, 29 Jul 1999 18:10:17 -0500; Dont have my copy of the NEC here so cant confirm, some of us still live in the free world of USA where inspections dont happen and you can use some common sense in home use. How many hams have anten; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-07/msg00518.html (11,264 bytes)
5. [TowerTalk] Parallel conduits (score: 1): Author: dlleikis@deseretonline.com (David Leikis); Date: Thu, 29 Jul 1999 18:29:59 -0600; The requirements of the NEC are for safety not your personal harassment! The reason for the separation is to prevent the conduction of a lightning strike from jumping from one circuit (which is groun; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-07/msg00519.html (7,930 bytes)
6. [TowerTalk] Parallel conduits (score: 1): Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Fri, 30 Jul 1999 05:45:10 -0400; Hi Ron, Depends on how well the feedline is installed and if it has common mode currents. I run 120 volts out on cables, but I: 1.) Fuse them at low current. 2.) Isolate them through a isolation tran; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-07/msg00527.html (8,297 bytes)
7. [TowerTalk] Parallel conduits (score: 1): Author: brian_smithson@vds.com (Brian Smithson); Date: Fri, 30 Jul 1999 07:51:17 -0400; Besides the safety reason (is there a better reason?) there is the financial aspect - your insurance company may not pay if they suspect your installation didn't follow NEC for something like this. -; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-07/msg00528.html (9,162 bytes)
8. [TowerTalk] Parallel conduits (score: 1): Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Fri, 30 Jul 1999 09:34:40 -0400; I believe that needless and silly but very real problem is negated if he used an isolation device of some sort to feed the wires and does not make them a branch of the electrical wiring of the house; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-07/msg00530.html (8,573 bytes)
9. [TowerTalk] Parallel conduits (score: 1): Author: KI9A@aol.com (KI9A@aol.com); Date: Fri, 30 Jul 1999 17:47:31 EDT; << Their concern is up to the outlet, not beyond. >> Acually, there is a section in the NEC that covers amateur transmitters, ect. Silly stuff like no smaller than 14ga wire for dipoles, ect. Cant re; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-07/msg00535.html (7,855 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]