Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Phased\s+Loops\s+\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Phased\s+Loops\s+\?\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Phased Loops ? (score: 1): Author: wstrahl@lucent.com (wstrahl@lucent.com); Date: 5 Mar 97 10:45:00 -0600; I'm presently using a delta-loop fed 1/4 wave down one side for 80m. It's hung off my tower at about 80' up. For next season I'd like to have a bit more OOMPF (tm) if I can figure out some other opti; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-03/msg00050.html (7,577 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] Phased Loops ? (score: 1): Author: k4sb@avana.net (k4sb@avana.net); Date: Wed, 5 Mar 97 19:54:45 PST; Yes Wayne, definitely worth pursuing...But, use a full wave loop, and feed the sucker at 17.5 % UP from one of the bottom corners with 50 ohm coax. You only need the bottom line about 6-8 feet off th; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-03/msg00051.html (7,253 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] Phased Loops ? (score: 1): Author: fisher@hp-and2.an.hp.com (Tony Brock-Fisher); Date: Thu, 6 Mar 1997 15:38:43 -0500; I'd highly recommend a pair of phased loops on 80 meters are nearly as effective as a 4-square, with the exception of the directional flexibility (only 2 directions switchable). Major advantages over; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-03/msg00080.html (8,799 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]