Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Phased\s+vertical\s+feed\?\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Phased\s+vertical\s+feed\?\?\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Phased vertical feed?? (score: 1): Author: k6ct@pacbell.net (k6ct); Date: Mon, 19 Jan 1998 09:06:27 -0800; I have a 2 element vertical array for 80m. I have received conflicting information as to how best to phase the two so I can go in either direction. The verticals are spaced 65 ft apart, are elevated; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-01/msg00315.html (7,734 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] Phased vertical feed?? (score: 1): Author: w7why@mail.coos.or.us (Tom Osborne); Date: Mon, 19 Jan 1998 17:42:16 +0800; Hi Tom. I'm using a vertical array on 40 using 3 verticals. I used it with 2 verticals for a long time and it worked very good. I just had some nulls with the array, so I put up the 3rd one to fill i; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-01/msg00317.html (9,099 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] Phased vertical feed?? (score: 1): Author: w4an@contesting.com (Bill Fisher - W4AN); Date: Mon, 19 Jan 1998 13:57:03 -0500 (EST); Interesting note Tom. Thank you. In regards to 80M I would strongly consider F/B as the most important attribute depending on QTH. On 80, I find that if I can hear them, they can hear me. Even befor; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-01/msg00320.html (8,087 bytes)
4. [TowerTalk] Phased vertical feed?? (score: 1): Author: nw9g@netusa1.net (NW9G); Date: Mon, 19 Jan 1998 12:58:50 -0500; Tom, I am not a pro by any means but I too phased 2 verticals with outstanding results using the 71 degree phase line. This actually has 84 degree lines going to each vertical with 213 coax to the re; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-01/msg00323.html (8,926 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]