Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Phasing\s+verticals\s+and\s+stubs\s*$/: 18 ]

Total 18 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Phasing verticals and stubs (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@verizon.net>
Date: Mon, 03 Apr 2006 18:56:07 -0700
Howdy all I'm putting my 3 40 meter phased verticals back up after the storms took them down. A question I have is, if I put my stubs back in the line, is it going to mess up the phasing? I'm using 1
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-04/msg00064.html (6,567 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] Phasing verticals and stubs (score: 1)
Author: Don Havlicek <n8de@thepoint.net>
Date: Tue, 04 Apr 2006 00:56:01 -0400
Tom, Why not put the three verticals in a right triangle. You can remotely switch the phasing using voltage over the coax so it will beam four compass directions. Mine were [and will be soon] phased
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-04/msg00067.html (8,194 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] Phasing verticals and stubs (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@verizon.net>
Date: Tue, 04 Apr 2006 17:41:28 -0700
Hi Don They are in a right triangle, but mine are switchable in 6 directions. I had them all set up before and they worked great, but the winter storm took them all down. I have 2 of them up now and
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-04/msg00085.html (9,082 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] Phasing verticals and stubs (score: 1)
Author: "Bill" <w7vp@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2006 06:26:19 -0700
Hi Guys Can you explain the "right triangle." My understanding is that the three are in an equilateral triangle (60 degrees between each antenna). Bill W7VP __________________________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-04/msg00099.html (10,713 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] Phasing verticals and stubs (score: 1)
Author: Don Havlicek <n8de@thepoint.net>
Date: Wed, 05 Apr 2006 10:39:02 -0400
The 'right triangle' system utilizes two verticals per selected direction with the third 'floating'. The 'equilateral triangle' system uses all three verticals simultaneously, but requires much more
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-04/msg00103.html (11,889 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] Phasing verticals and stubs (score: 1)
Author: Ian White GM3SEK <gm3sek@ifwtech.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2006 16:22:12 +0100
Any triangle system can be used with either two or three elements energized - check with ON4UN's book for details. In either case, the most practical and versatile system for beam switching is the eq
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-04/msg00104.html (9,215 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] Phasing verticals and stubs (score: 1)
Author: Don Havlicek <n8de@thepoint.net>
Date: Wed, 05 Apr 2006 11:36:56 -0400
Comments inserted below: Most practical? It requires separate control line for .2db additional in any one direction, but narrows the beamwidth [with reference to 1/2-power points] to do this, making
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-04/msg00105.html (10,204 bytes)

8. Re: [TowerTalk] Phasing verticals and stubs (score: 1)
Author: "Clive Whelan" <clive.whelan@btinternet.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2006 16:05:32 -0000
<When all three elements are used, usually one is driven with 100% current, and the other two are driven at the same phase with about 50% current each. The beam directions are off the top or the bott
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-04/msg00106.html (9,765 bytes)

9. Re: [TowerTalk] Phasing verticals and stubs (score: 1)
Author: "Bill" <w7vp@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2006 10:58:59 -0700
Don: What you are describing sounds like simply two 2-antenna systems placed 90 degrees to each other where on of the antennas is common to both. I conclude that from your statement that there are 4
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-04/msg00110.html (12,785 bytes)

10. Re: [TowerTalk] Phasing verticals and stubs (score: 1)
Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Wed, 05 Apr 2006 12:59:55 -0700
Depends on the spacing of the antennas. If they are closer than 1/4 wavelength, then you can get a very narrow beam with fairly high gain. Think of a W8JK turned on it's side. There are, of course, t
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-04/msg00115.html (10,342 bytes)

11. Re: [TowerTalk] Phasing verticals and stubs (score: 1)
Author: Ian White GM3SEK <gm3sek@ifwtech.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2006 21:44:30 +0100
When using pairs of elements with the same spacing and phasing, and the third element disconnected, an equilateral triangle array and a right triangle array will have exactly the same gain and beamwi
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-04/msg00116.html (12,168 bytes)

12. Re: [TowerTalk] Phasing verticals and stubs (score: 1)
Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Wed, 05 Apr 2006 14:50:39 -0700
I would qualify that with "using a simple switching/phasing system". If you have fully adjustable phasing networks, the performance of the two systems (right angle or equilateral) would be comparable
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-04/msg00117.html (9,326 bytes)

13. Re: [TowerTalk] Phasing verticals and stubs (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@verizon.net>
Date: Wed, 05 Apr 2006 17:42:07 -0700
Yes, I meant they are in an equilateral triangle. Had a brain fart. Lots of postings on this subject, but nobody has yet answered my original question. I'll post it again. I have 2 stubs, separtated
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-04/msg00121.html (14,053 bytes)

14. Re: [TowerTalk] Phasing verticals and stubs (score: 1)
Author: "Gary Schafer" <garyschafer@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2006 21:04:45 -0400
What are the stubs for? What are they tuned to? Why would you have a 1/4 wave phasing line on a single vertical? Or are you saying that the stubs are separated by 1/4 wave on the feed line to the ver
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-04/msg00122.html (16,160 bytes)

15. Re: [TowerTalk] Phasing verticals and stubs (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@verizon.net>
Date: Wed, 05 Apr 2006 20:14:12 -0700
For interstation interference reduction Tuned to the CW part of 40 I have a line from my rig to a stub, 1/4 line to the next stub, then to the antenna Tom W7WHY ______________________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-04/msg00124.html (17,010 bytes)

16. Re: [TowerTalk] Phasing verticals and stubs (score: 1)
Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Thu, 06 Apr 2006 06:33:24 -0700
Coax stubs? Like the ones used as a trap for other bands? Or, are they part of the tuning network? Either way, they'll have some inductance or capacitance, and so, will change the phase. The real que
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-04/msg00127.html (10,358 bytes)

17. Re: [TowerTalk] Phasing verticals and stubs (score: 1)
Author: "Gary Schafer" <garyschafer@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2006 10:24:04 -0400
Hi Tom, They should have no effect on antenna performance if they are where I think they are, that is on the feed line coming from your transmitter and not on the phasing line in the vertical network
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-04/msg00132.html (19,782 bytes)

18. Re: [TowerTalk] Phasing verticals and stubs (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@verizon.net>
Date: Thu, 06 Apr 2006 17:15:54 -0700
Hi Gary Yep, they are on the line between the transmitter and the "T" fitting to the network. I tried them out last night (with 2 of the 3 verticals) and didn't seem to make much difference in the SW
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-04/msg00147.html (9,054 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu