Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Phillystran\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Phillystran\s*$/: 71 ]

Total 71 documents matching your query.

1. [Towertalk] Phillystran (score: 1): Author: dave@dpomeroy.com (Dave Pomeroy); Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2002 15:34:07 -0800; I have a fifty foot guyed tower and was wondering how much Phillystran do I need in the top guys. The tower is guyed right under the rotor. 10 feet down, 20 feet down, what say you folks. Thanks for; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-10/msg00782.html (7,115 bytes)
2. [Towertalk] Phillystran (score: 1): Author: dave@dpomeroy.com (Dave Pomeroy); Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2002 23:38:22 -0800; I guess I didn't make myself understood. I don't want to run Phillystran from the top of tower to the ground. I just want to run it down so my A3S is not affected by a steel guy. I just figured I wou; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-10/msg00785.html (7,381 bytes)
3. [Towertalk] Phillystran (score: 1): Author: k2av@contesting.com (Guy Olinger, K2AV); Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 08:55:36 -0500; A number that will reduce interaction substantially is 1/2 wave worth of philly on the LOWEST frequency in use on top of the tower. Others may tell you that going all philly except for the last 12 fe; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-10/msg00788.html (8,846 bytes)
4. [Towertalk] Phillystran (score: 1): Author: n4kg@juno.com (n4kg@juno.com); Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 09:11:52 -0600; You neglected to provide a NECESSARY piece of information, namely the DISTANCE to the Guy Anchor. The formula for the hypotenuse (L) of a triangle formed by the tower base, guy point on the tower (H); /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-10/msg00790.html (8,464 bytes)
5. [Towertalk] Phillystran (score: 1): Author: dave@dpomeroy.com (Dave Pomeroy); Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 08:03:51 -0800; Ok folks thanks for the info. No 40 meter beam on the top of my tower. This little tower requires the rotor to be above the tower so there is no top bearing. Anyway the recommendation was for 33 ft o; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-10/msg00794.html (7,387 bytes)
6. [Towertalk] Phillystran (score: 1): Author: kg5u@hal-pc.org (Dale L Martin); Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 10:57:44 -0600; Dave, I may not be reading you right, but if you plan to runn Phillystran directly from the tower top down 33ft, you might want to reconsider that. (Fellow TT'ers, please correct me if I'm misspeakin; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-10/msg00795.html (9,237 bytes)
7. [Towertalk] Phillystran (score: 1): Author: n4kg@juno.com (n4kg@juno.com); Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 17:45:39 -0600; SNIP about NEVER place the first insulator over 5 ft from the top of a tower. Remember, there is continuity from the insulator, *through* the tower, to the first insulator on the other guys. (e.g. 5+; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-10/msg00811.html (9,450 bytes)
8. [Towertalk] Phillystran (score: 1): Author: ka4inm@tampabay.rr.com (Ronald KA4INM Youvan); Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 00:31:07 -0500; Hypotenuse. -- 73 (= Best Regards) de: Ron ka4inm@tampabay.rr.com 100% LINUX, since July, 1997 SENT Time and Date are UTC Visit my HAM Web SITE at: http://www.qsl.net/ka4inm; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-10/msg00818.html (7,530 bytes)
9. [Towertalk] Phillystran (score: 1): Author: ag0n@arrl.net (ag0n@arrl.net); Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2002 10:00:50 -0600; Just to correct my spelling in the other thread, it is Phillystran. Interesting how many web pages have it wrong, including commercial ones. When I was typing up that post, I went to Google and did a; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-04/msg00460.html (6,607 bytes)
10. [TowerTalk] Phillystran (score: 1): Author: adb1x1@yahoo.com (Anthony Bowyer); Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2001 12:02:30 -0700 (PDT); I have a question. I noted that Texas Towers has several "strengths" of Phil1ystran. How do you gauge what you need? I have a 50' Aluma tower which will have a relatively light quad. Is 1200# enough?; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-08/msg00152.html (8,068 bytes)
11. [TowerTalk] Phillystran (score: 1): Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com); Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2001 19:45:21 EDT; The part number of the Phillystran corresponds to the ultimate breaking strength of EHS cables. For instance, the breaking strength of 3/16" EHS is 4000 pounds; the equivalent Phillystran is HPTG4000; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-08/msg00168.html (8,186 bytes)
12. [TowerTalk] Phillystran (score: 1): Author: n0tt1@juno.com (n0tt1@juno.com); Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2001 03:23:50 +0100; Hi Anthony, I'll try to help... Use the same breaking strength as the cable you should use, such as 4000 lbs for 3/16" EHS. Be sure to tension the guys equally and "to specs"...as I remember it that'; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-08/msg00177.html (9,382 bytes)
13. [TowerTalk] Phillystran (score: 1): Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com); Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2001 10:38:50 EDT; There isn't a single tower in the world that uses 1200# guys. The smallest tower manufacturer specified size is 3/16" EHS (Extra High Strength) ONLY - not SS aircraft cable, not any other grade. You; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-08/msg00186.html (10,929 bytes)
14. [TowerTalk] Phillystran (score: 1): Author: alsopb@gloryroad.net (alsopb); Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2001 17:43:38 +0000; This is wrong. Glenn Martin aluminium towers use 1200# stuff. They are nearly self-supporting to 60' and rated at 15+ sq ft at 86mph with the guys. They also use screw in anchors. The concrete base i; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-08/msg00192.html (7,981 bytes)
15. [TowerTalk] Phillystran (score: 1): Author: ww5l@gte.net (Tom Anderson); Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2001 14:22:48 -0500; I use the 1200 pound Phillystran only as the support for the 40m kit on my Mosley Classic 33 WARC beam. Mosley enclosed some black dacron rope with the antenna, but it was already frayed when I recei; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-08/msg00195.html (12,541 bytes)
16. [TowerTalk] Phillystran (score: 1): Author: n0tt1@juno.com (n0tt1@juno.com); Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2001 01:30:58 +0100; I haven't looked for Phillystran for years...thanks for the update LXC! The new product sounds MUCH easier to use than the original that is supposed to last 70 years..hi hi 73, Charlie, N0TT _______; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-08/msg00209.html (8,746 bytes)
17. [TowerTalk] Phillystran (score: 1): Author: steve@oakcom.com (Steve Maki); Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2001 23:03:01 -0400; There is an alternative to Big Grips - the factory calls them spelter sockets, which are similar to the old potting terminations, but heavier duty. In fact, spelter sockets are the ONLY option on the; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-08/msg00211.html (8,227 bytes)
18. [TowerTalk] Phillystran (score: 1): Author: tacox@concentric.net (Terry A. Cox); Date: Thu, 22 Oct 1998 00:46:35 -0500; Thanks to all who responded to my request for info. The questions were pretty simple, but I wanted a sanity check and youse guys came thru! 73, -- Terry A. Cox - KB4KA - Collierville, TN e-mail to ta; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-10/msg00805.html (6,835 bytes)
19. [TowerTalk] Phillystran (score: 1): Author: harpole@pegasus.cc.ucf.edu (Charles H. Harpole); Date: Sat, 30 May 1998 21:33:59 -0400 (EDT); A reason to use Phillystran includes the possibility of more than one tower at one site. Then, Philly really can help loads on the multiple pattern problems. 73< K4VUD -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.conte; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-05/msg00794.html (8,388 bytes)
20. [TowerTalk] Phillystran (score: 1): Author: ehayes@VNET.IBM.COM (ehayes@VNET.IBM.COM); Date: Mon, 19 May 97 07:29:12 CDT; Wanted to do a little comparison shopping for phillystran but am having trouble finding out who carries the stuff. Texas Towers is one distributor but I don't know anyone else. Can you help me out? T; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-05/msg00463.html (6,788 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4]