Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Pipe\s+to\s+mount\s+vertical\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Pipe\s+to\s+mount\s+vertical\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Pipe to mount vertical (score: 1): Author: "Clint Talmadge W5CPT" <w5cpt@bellsouth.net>; Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2011 10:01:19 -0600; There has been some discussion here on the reflector about the strength of the pipe/tube to mount a vertical. It occurs to me that I may not want a very strong pipe/tubes as a mount. Years ago I dug; /archives//html/Towertalk/2011-01/msg00218.html (8,021 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] Pipe to mount vertical (score: 1): Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>; Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2011 08:22:11 -0800; Having a structural "fuse" is a good idea, assuming the consequences of the fuse blowing are acceptable. I've thought about the pin/socket scheme, but always worried about it getting stuck. _________; /archives//html/Towertalk/2011-01/msg00219.html (8,729 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] Pipe to mount vertical (score: 1): Author: Roger <roger@rogerhalstead.com>; Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2011 17:39:07 -0500; Flexibility and elasticity should also be taken into account. There are things that will work and things that will destroy the antenna, particularly a vertical. Verticals as well as all structures ha; /archives//html/Towertalk/2011-01/msg00254.html (14,766 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]