Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Please\s+your\s+opinion\s+of\s+C31XR\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Please your opinion of C31XR (score: 1)
Author: Alfredo V&eacute;lez WP3C <wp3c@usa.com>
Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2007 17:00:22 -0400
Hi everybody I want to know your opinion about C31XR because i want to buy a good antenna that works 10M, 15M and 20M in monobands in just one boom. I have TH7DX but i want to get better my station.
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-03/msg00123.html (7,020 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] Please your opinion of C31XR (score: 1)
Author: "Ken Shutt" <kgshutt@cox.net>
Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2007 21:10:33 -0600
I also have a TH7DX. My SteppIR is scheduled to arrive next week. I don'thave alternates to offer. I'll let you know how it plays. 73 de Ken _______________________________________________ __________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-03/msg00142.html (8,201 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] Please your opinion of C31XR (score: 1)
Author: K7LXC@aol.com
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2007 12:24:57 EDT
Well, actually the TH7 is a really good performing tribander. So is the C31 but since they're similar boomlengths, the performance is similar. I don't know how much you'd be actually gaining by upgr
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-03/msg00165.html (8,591 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] Please your opinion of C31XR (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Fatchett" <mike@mallardcove.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2007 10:40:06 -0600
The TH7 uses lots of traps. You can read what F12 thinks of traps and read the tribander report from Steve. I have used C3's in the past and in my experience the C3's performed just as well as the TH
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-03/msg00166.html (10,214 bytes)

5. [TowerTalk] Please your opinion of C31XR (score: 1)
Author: RLVZ@aol.com
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2007 12:54:32 EDT
Lots of Pros & Cons! Some of the Cons: Yes- the TH7DX has traps, and the C31XR has flimsy elements that bounce around in the wind incl. the driven element that detunes performance in windy conditions
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-03/msg00167.html (10,307 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] Please your opinion of C31XR (score: 1)
Author: <ve4xt@mts.net>
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2007 13:13:16 -0500
As Steve has said, the TH7 works pretty well for what it is. I used two at WB0O in SS Phone and I've never felt so loud. My advice would be to save your money, keep the TH7 until it irrepairably brea
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-03/msg00174.html (12,620 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] Please your opinion of C31XR (score: 1)
Author: "mryan001" <mryan001@tampabay.rr.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2007 14:29:15 -0500
I "ROGER THAT" sentiment...TH7 is a keeper. -Mike As Steve has said, the TH7 works pretty well for what it is. I used two at WB0O in SS Phone and I've never felt so loud. My advice would be to save y
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-03/msg00177.html (13,867 bytes)

8. Re: [TowerTalk] Please your opinion of C31XR (score: 1)
Author: VR2BrettGraham <vr2bg@harts.org.hk>
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2007 00:21:27 +0000
Took a little while to figure out who started this thread, as very quickly folks are posting responses to other folks' posts... it was WP3C. He asked about a single-boom 10/15/20m beam that would wor
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-03/msg00186.html (8,972 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu