- 21. Re: [TowerTalk] Porcupines and other wives tales (score: 1)
- Author: "Gary Schafer" <garyschafer@comcast.net>
- Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 20:23:34 -0500
- Sorry Bill, but my rabbit's foot is just as logical as your claim of changing the distribution of charge. I have more basis for my rabbit's foot claim, my tower has never been hit. NASSA doesn't thin
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-07/msg00190.html (15,945 bytes)
- 22. Re: [TowerTalk] Porcupines and other wives tales (score: 1)
- Author: "David Robbins K1TTT" <k1ttt@arrl.net>
- Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 17:55:09 -0000
- An 'essay' on a web site is hardly a peer reviewed journal article in a publication specializing in lightning. I'll stick with the explanations out of those publications for now, thank you. David Rob
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-07/msg00205.html (17,412 bytes)
- 23. Re: [TowerTalk] Porcupines and other wives tales (score: 1)
- Author: "Richard Hill" <REHill@ix.netcom.com>
- Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 11:16:39 -0700
- Too ignorant to take sides, but I found this paper interesting: http://www.phy.olemiss.edu/~jgladden/phys510/spring06/Gurevich.pdf I also recall the paper that "proved" bees can't fly (everyone remem
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-07/msg00233.html (18,586 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu