Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Porcupines\s+on\s+commercial\s+towers\s+and\s+stuff\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TowerTalk] Porcupines on commercial towers and stuff (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2005 07:09:29 -0500
The fact government or private installations buy things and install them doesn't mean they work as claimed. Governments are also slow to learn anything. A con artist from Florida selling sliced-up s
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-03/msg00622.html (10,421 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] Porcupines on commercial towers and stuff (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Lux" <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2005 06:48:07 -0800
I concur with Tom,here. It's not necessarily that the govt is slow to learn. Here are two examples where there's a perfectly good reason to buy something that turns out useless. 1) The govt may buy t
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-03/msg00629.html (11,946 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] Porcupines on commercial towers and stuff (score: 1)
Author: Bill Aycock <baycock@direcway.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2005 12:12:28 -0600
Tom- do the golfers face True North, or drive that way? Bill Bill Aycock - W4BSG Woodville, Alabama _______________________________________________ See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Supporting
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-03/msg00634.html (9,079 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] Porcupines on commercial towers and stuff (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2005 13:32:51 -0500
with Actually I'm thinking of making a golfer rod. After all, someone copied Mary Poppin's umbrella. So why not something else that we know attracts lightning? What about an owl with spiked spiney h
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-03/msg00637.html (9,362 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] Porcupines on commercial towers and stuff (score: 1)
Author: Red <RedHaines@centurytel.net>
Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2005 12:58:28 -0600
I enjoy the chuckle! Is there a preferred direction toward which the golfer should face? 73 de WO&Oslash;W : -) _______________________________________________ See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Sel
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-03/msg00639.html (8,662 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] Porcupines on commercial towers and stuff (score: 1)
Author: "Doug Grant" <k1dg@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2005 19:08:16 -0000
Include a compass and directions that show how to point it to true North, and you'll sell a ton of them at Dayton. In fact, throw two over the fence at Wright-Patterson on the way to the arena, wait
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-03/msg00641.html (7,688 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] Porcupines on commercial towers and stuff (score: 1)
Author: Jim Smith <jimsmith@shaw.ca>
Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2005 11:32:04 -0800
It just occurred to me that you can easily prevent the lightning from hitting the tower at all by the simple expedient of equipping the golfer with a 1 iron. I believe that it was Chi Chi Rodriguez w
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-03/msg00642.html (10,292 bytes)

8. Re: [TowerTalk] Porcupines on commercial towers and stuff (score: 1)
Author: "Gene Smar" <ersmar@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2005 17:34:45 -0500
Of course: True North! 73 de Gene Smar AD3F I enjoy the chuckle! Is there a preferred direction toward which the golfer should face? 73 de WO&Oslash;W : -) ___________________________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-03/msg00645.html (9,633 bytes)

9. Re: [TowerTalk] Porcupines on commercial towers and stuff (score: 1)
Author: Gary Schafer <garyschafer@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2005 19:41:44 -0500
I am surprised that the seller did not recommend "extensive grounding" to go along with the dissipaters. They usually do. This is to ensure that the dissipaters "work" properly. They don't tell the c
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-03/msg00650.html (12,506 bytes)

10. Re: [TowerTalk] Porcupines on commercial towers and stuff (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Lux" <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2005 18:07:57 -0800
Such events are why we at JPL are forbidden to write evaulation letters or emails, without having first received explicit permission to do so. They'd much prefer that if you're going to say something
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-03/msg00653.html (10,162 bytes)

11. Re: [TowerTalk] Porcupines on commercial towers and stuff (score: 1)
Author: Jim <kj0m@mchsi.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2005 21:03:30 -0600
On Mar 19, 2005, at 6:10 PM, "Doug Grant" <k1dg@ix.netcom.com> LOL! Ain't it the truth! 73, Jim KJ0M ._._. _______________________________________________ See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Sup
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-03/msg00656.html (8,088 bytes)

12. Re: [TowerTalk] Porcupines on commercial towers and stuff (score: 1)
Author: "D. Scott MacKenzie" <kb0fhp@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2005 22:09:26 -0500
And I thought I was good at marketing...... On Mar 19, 2005, at 6:10 PM, "Doug Grant" <k1dg@ix.netcom.com> LOL! Ain't it the truth! 73, Jim KJ0M ._._. _______________________________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-03/msg00657.html (8,938 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu