Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Portable\s+analyzers\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Portable\s+analyzers\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Portable analyzers (score: 1): Author: "Hardy Landskov" <n7rt@brighthouse.com>; Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2016 10:13:05 -0400; I would like to get something portable for checking antenna VSWR. I was looking at the Rig Expert units. Anyone have an opinion? I don't want to hook it up to a computer when on the tower. Hardy N7RT; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-07/msg00198.html (7,100 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] Portable analyzers (score: 1): Author: Paul Braiman <braimanbiz@charter.net>; Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2016 22:30:11 -0700; I've been using the AA-600 for 2+ years now. Very capable analyzer. Screen is easy to read, the controls easy to use. The only drawbacks are the use of a type n connector, and the slow time it takes; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-07/msg00202.html (7,964 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] Portable analyzers (score: 1): Author: Les Kalmus <w2lk@bk-lk.com>; Date: Sat, 9 Jul 2016 08:14:06 -0400; Hardy, I have an AA-30. It's been with me up and down the tower, in the field and on two big DXpeditions in the far Pacific. Easy to use and adjust and very convenient to carry. Normally I use it for; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-07/msg00207.html (8,643 bytes)
4. [TowerTalk] Portable analyzers (score: 1): Author: Bill Cotter <n4lg@qx.net>; Date: Sat, 09 Jul 2016 07:52:18 -0400; Hardy, Attached is a marketing analysis of several handheld analyzers I did for our ham club. It has links to the technical details. 73 Bill N4lG At 10:13 AM 7/7/2016, Hardy Landskov wrote: I would l; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-07/msg00209.html (7,591 bytes)
5. Re: [TowerTalk] Portable analyzers (score: 1): Author: jimlux <jimlux@earthlink.net>; Date: Sat, 9 Jul 2016 07:29:42 -0700; Can you change the number of frequency points it uses to do the time domain plot? I assume it's measuring at a series of frequency steps and then doing a transform to time domain. If you don't need; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-07/msg00211.html (8,554 bytes)
6. Re: [TowerTalk] Portable analyzers (score: 1): Author: Paul Braiman <braimanbiz@charter.net>; Date: Sat, 9 Jul 2016 08:28:31 -0700; According to manual, the TDR function is accomplished by measuring R and X over the entire frequency range (in my case 600 MHz).Then an IFFT is applied to the data and impulse and step response are c; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-07/msg00215.html (9,380 bytes)
7. Re: [TowerTalk] Portable analyzers (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Sat, 9 Jul 2016 09:59:00 -0700; Attached is a marketing analysis of several handheld analyzers I did for our ham club. It has links to the technical details. The Tower Talk list does not support attachments. Hardy, You said you wan; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-07/msg00220.html (10,007 bytes)
8. Re: [TowerTalk] Portable analyzers (score: 1): Author: Richard Solomon <dickw1ksz@gmail.com>; Date: Sat, 9 Jul 2016 10:48:52 -0700; You guys can laugh all you want to, but my MFJ-259, which is quite old, maybe 15 years ?? Still works like a charm. 73, Dick, W1KSZ _______________________________________________ ___________________; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-07/msg00223.html (10,268 bytes)
9. Re: [TowerTalk] Portable analyzers (score: 1): Author: Matthew King - KK4CPS <KK4CPS@gmail.com>; Date: Sat, 9 Jul 2016 16:22:50 -0400; My AA-600 has been used on countless antenna projects, for many TDR sweeps, for return loss measurements of connectors, etc... Wouldn't swap it for the world! THe MFJ-259 CANNOT work well in a high R; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-07/msg00235.html (12,288 bytes)
10. Re: [TowerTalk] Portable analyzers (score: 1): Author: "Roger (K8RI) on TT" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>; Date: Sat, 9 Jul 2016 16:37:01 -0400; I don't even bother with the portable ones any more as an AIM will give me all the numbers at each ens and along the coax, unless working at the antenna. As I can't climb any more, that's not very of; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-07/msg00239.html (9,466 bytes)
11. Re: [TowerTalk] Portable analyzers (score: 1): Author: Bob K6UJ <k6uj@pacbell.net>; Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2016 13:52:07 -0700; Wow Dick,, You still have an MFJ-259 ? That's incredible, I think they came over on the Mayflower. Just kidding, I have one too and it still works fine. :-) I bought an AA-30 also and like the graphs; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-07/msg00266.html (11,169 bytes)
12. Re: [TowerTalk] Portable analyzers (score: 1): Author: Richard Solomon <dickw1ksz@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2016 15:18:18 -0700; It seems to be about that old. I stuck a small re-chargeable battery on the back that powers it for several days. One nice thing about living out here in the Sonoran Desert, AM BC Stations are few an; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-07/msg00268.html (13,176 bytes)
13. Re: [TowerTalk] Portable analyzers (score: 1): Author: <john@kk9a.com>; Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2016 21:17:50 -0400; I have a MFJ-259B. It is the the only MFJ product that I own. Mine has worked well for checking and adjusting antennas while on the tower. John KK9A Wow Dick,, You still have an MFJ-259 ? That's incr; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-07/msg00269.html (8,488 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 13
Page: [1]