DA 03-2196 WT- Docket No. 02-100 Adopted July 3, 2003 and released July 7, 2003 MO&O stating essentially that municipal ordinances which directly regulate RFI are invalid, as the FCC is the sole juri
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2196A1.pdf Substitute .txt or .doc if you would rather have it in ASCII (.txt) or as a Microsquish Word document (.doc) Scott Townley NX7U Gilb
There's a Circuit Court Opinion on point as well. I don't know the cite, but it says the same thing. The FCC completely occupies the field. State and local ordinances are invalid. There's another one
Very interesting, and thank you! How can we get a copy of this? Can you provide a link or directions how to access this? 73, Chuck..K1KW invalid, as the FCC is the sole jurisdiction regarding RFI. co
The decision was based on the doctrine of federal preemption of state and local laws by Article VI (the "Supremacy Clause) of the U.S. Constitution, which reads, in pertinent part, as follows: This C
Billy, You got it wrong ... they did not sue WA6GVG they tried to sue K6AU. local laws by Article VI (the "Supremacy Clause) of the U.S. Constitution, which reads, in pertinent part, as follows: in p
TT: http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2003/dd030707.html . Then scroll down to the ruling on the Cingular Wireless case, about two-thirds of the way down the page. 73 de Gene Smar AD3F r
Billy, You got it wrong ... they did not sue WA6GVG they tried to sue K6AU. You are absolutely right, Terry. I apologize for the mistake. Bill Crowell, N6AYJ _________________________________________