Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Power\s+x\s+RG58\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Power\s+x\s+RG58\s*$/: 11 ]

Total 11 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Power x RG58 (score: 1): Author: pt2ho@contesting.com (PT2HO - Carlos); Date: Sat, 7 Nov 1998 23:06:43 -0200; The ARRL Antenna Book says that the inexpensive RG58 can easily handle full legal limit (1500w) on frequencies below 10mhz. What about 10, 12, 15, 17 and 20m?? How much power the RG58 can handle on t; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-11/msg00192.html (7,959 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] Power x RG58 (score: 1): Author: ka4inm@gate.net (Ron Youvan); Date: Sun, 08 Nov 98 02:22:42 PST; Hi: snip The ARRL Antenna Book says that the inexpensive RG58 can easily handle full legal limit (1500w) on frequencies below 10mhz. snip Did it say that a moderate reflected power would melt it? Sea; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-11/msg00195.html (8,594 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] Power x RG58 (score: 1): Author: pt2ho@contesting.com (PT2HO - Carlos); Date: Sun, 8 Nov 1998 02:33:03 -0200; Ron, "In general, full legal amateur power can be safely applied to inexpensive RG-58 coax in the bands below 10MHZ. Cables of RG8 family can withstand full amateur power through the VHF spectrum, bu; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-11/msg00197.html (10,302 bytes)
4. [TowerTalk] Power x RG58 (score: 1): Author: zettel@homer.libby.org (Steve Zettel); Date: Sun, 8 Nov 1998 10:36:47 -0700; You all are talking power, implying VxI and perhaps worried about heating effects. Another consideration is the insulation voltage breakdown point, which another correspondent touched on. This relate; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-11/msg00200.html (8,703 bytes)
5. [TowerTalk] Power x RG58 (score: 1): Author: w8ji.tom@MCIONE.com (w8ji.tom); Date: Sun, 08 Nov 1998 14:48:07 -0500; inexpensive The Handbook is correct. It will handle 1500 watts CW and SSB below 10 MHz. I use it in jumpers, sometimes even on the test bench. Sometimes I run up to 5 kW through it on higher frequen; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-11/msg00205.html (9,018 bytes)
6. [TowerTalk] Power x RG58 (score: 1): Author: n1rj@ime.net (Roger D. Johnson); Date: Sun, 08 Nov 1998 15:53:31 -0500; The power rating of coax varies approximately with the square root of frequency ( 2 X freq power, is divided by 1.414; 4 x freq, power is divided by 2). The power loss is converted to heat so the act; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-11/msg00206.html (8,171 bytes)
7. [TowerTalk] Power x RG58 (score: 1): Author: jreid@aloha.net (Jim Reid); Date: Sun, 8 Nov 1998 13:00:50 -1000; Most of us avoid the smaller coax because the loss to rcv'd signals! To me, for runs over several feet, I will not use the small coax because of loss to signals and perhaps the chance of missing a w; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-11/msg00209.html (8,249 bytes)
8. [TowerTalk] Power x RG58 (score: 1): Author: n4kg@juno.com (T A RUSSELL); Date: Mon, 9 Nov 1998 00:04:17 -0600; Transmit loss concerns yes, receive loss concerns, no problem on HF. As long as you can hear atmospheric noise in the receiver, gain loss ahead of the receiver is NOT a problem. My Beverages are 10 d; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-11/msg00217.html (9,857 bytes)
9. [TowerTalk] Power x RG58 (score: 1): Author: CQK8DO@aol.com (CQK8DO@aol.com); Date: Mon, 9 Nov 1998 08:29:28 EST; Ummm, a few years ago in the heat of battle a three foot long RG58 jumper got tossed into the space between the 3K Ultra/Bird and and the antenna switcher on the 160 meter run station... later in the; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-11/msg00225.html (8,562 bytes)
10. [TowerTalk] Power x RG58 (score: 1): Author: davidc@bit-net.com (DavidC); Date: Mon, 9 Nov 1998 10:38:51 -0500; Tom: I would sure love to understand this concept better, as I am sure many others here would. Both on TX and RX we are dealing with electrical energy which may be sustained or reduced as it travels; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-11/msg00232.html (9,478 bytes)
11. [TowerTalk] Power x RG58 (score: 1): Author: k1vr@juno.com (Fred Hopengarten); Date: Mon, 09 Nov 1998 11:15:37 EST; K1VR: N4KG is talking about Beverage antennas, on the bands where they are useful -- 160 and 80. Signal strength is not the gating factor. The problem to attack is signal to noise ratio, so attenuati; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-11/msg00234.html (9,966 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 11
Page: [1]