Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Pre\-dug\s+ground\s+rod\s+holes\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Pre\-dug\s+ground\s+rod\s+holes\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Pre-Dug ground rod holes (score: 1): Author: WarrenWolff@aol.com; Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2003 12:09:29 EST; It seems to me that someone on this list made some negative comments about drilling holes for ground rods. I will be installing a gaggle of ground rods at my Lake Havasu City location. I certainly wa; /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00725.html (7,298 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] Pre-dug ground rod holes (score: 1): Author: WarrenWolff@aol.com; Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2003 12:57:18 EST; What does that mean? I must be too too slow. Are you saying that all communities have signed on to Copper Sulfate intrusion? I fully planned to have a hefty auger dig the holes for my ground rods. My; /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00726.html (7,503 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] Pre-dug ground rod holes (score: 1): Author: "Blake Meinecke" <n4gi@tampabay.rr.com>; Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2003 14:17:56 -0500; My initial response to this query a private one, as is isn't really an issue that has anything to do with towers. This should answer your questions though: http://pmep.cce.cornell.edu/profiles/extoxn; /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00727.html (9,909 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] Pre-dug ground rod holes (score: 1): Author: "Jim Lux" <jimlux@earthlink.net>; Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2003 11:48:23 -0800; The reason why are you driving rods (multiple ones at that) will determine your best course of action. Is it for: Electrical Safety - green wire ground Lightning protection RF ground Practice driving; /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00728.html (11,978 bytes)
5. Re: [TowerTalk] Pre-dug ground rod holes (score: 1): Author: W0UN -- John Brosnahan <shr@swtexas.net>; Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2003 14:58:27 -0600; The buildings out at NASA White Sands Test Facility in Las Cruces, NM, RE: White Sands Missile Range Minor note--WSMR is an army facility. http://www.wsmr.army.mil/ John W0UN -- Outgoing mail is cert; /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00729.html (7,954 bytes)
6. Re: [TowerTalk] Pre-dug ground rod holes (score: 1): Author: "Michael Tope" <W4EF@dellroy.com>; Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2003 14:18:03 -0800; John, actually I think you and Jim are both right. Apparently there are co-located facilities: http://www.wstf.nasa.gov/ 73 de Mike, W4EF........................... -- -- -- -- Weather Stations", and; /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00731.html (9,417 bytes)
7. Re: [TowerTalk] Pre-dug ground rod holes (score: 1): Author: "Jim Lux" <jimlux@earthlink.net>; Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2003 18:19:12 -0800; WSMR is an army facility WSTF is a NASA facility (managed from Johnson) They are on opposite sides of the ridge of mountains. The buildings out at NASA White Sands Test Facility in Las Cruces, NM, RE; /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00749.html (8,768 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]