Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Protecting\s+Remote\s+Locations\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Protecting Remote Locations (score: 1)
Author: "N6KJ" <kelly@thejohnsons.ws>
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 10:19:45 -0700 (PDT)
How do people out there protect remote stations from vandalism? I've heard people talk about using metal shipping crates as "ham shacks" and stuff like that. How about the tower, ant, etc.? Anyone ha
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-07/msg00915.html (7,247 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] Protecting Remote Locations (score: 1)
Author: "EUGENE SMAR" <ersmar@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 18:46:28 +0100
In commercial installations, where deep pockets are the norm, the shelter owner would install intrusion detection and alrm systems on each shelter door. If any of these sensors would be tripped after
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-07/msg00921.html (9,306 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] Protecting Remote Locations (score: 1)
Author: "N6KJ" <kelly@thejohnsons.ws>
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 12:02:44 -0700 (PDT)
That sounds a bit high tech and unable to handle the "typical" vandal case. Besides, I'm talking about places that are quite remote where it may be difficult to set up a 2.4GHz link to the outside wo
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-07/msg00923.html (10,850 bytes)

4. Fw: [TowerTalk] Protecting Remote Locations (score: 1)
Author: "J.Hector Garcia M" <Hector@telecom1.net>
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 21:31:06 -0700
if your 2.4 ghz don't work , there are others bands that can handle your video or sensor cotrol. plus the audio or can activate another camera or device to take photos, activate an alarm. there are s
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-07/msg00940.html (12,583 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu