Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Published\s+Score\s+Reports\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Published\s+Score\s+Reports\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Published score reports (score: 1): Author: harpole@pegasus.cc.ucf.edu (Charles H. Harpole); Date: Tue, 16 Jun 1998 10:56:31 -0400 (EDT); So the score reports have been screwed up for several years???? Sad, but one side benefit is that now we know what we should have always known and practiced: play against yourself, u know your own sc; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-06/msg00563.html (8,038 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] Published score reports (score: 1): Author: rlboyd@CapAccess.org (Rich L. Boyd); Date: Tue, 16 Jun 1998 11:14:25 -0400 (EDT); Yep, some good points, Charles. I've made similar points many times to guys, particularly our members, when they are upset at having their confirmed log not listed. And it happens to someone, regadle; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-06/msg00565.html (10,411 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] Published score reports (score: 1): Author: W7TS@ibm.net (Ken Kinyon); Date: Tue, 16 Jun 1998 15:09:30 -0600; Why on earth is this discussion taking place on two reflectors? I assume that those sufficiently interested in contesting are getting it on the CQ-contest reflector so why post a copy to TowerTalk? 7; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-06/msg00582.html (11,404 bytes)
4. [TowerTalk] Published score reports (score: 1): Author: w7why@mail.coos.or.us (Tom Osborne); Date: Wed, 17 Jun 1998 00:10:44 -0700; That is one of the most fun things in contesting. Set up a contest among your buddies, and the loser has to take the winner (or winners) out for a beer and dinner. That's better than a plaque any day; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-06/msg00584.html (7,839 bytes)
5. [TowerTalk] Published score reports (score: 1): Author: w7why@mail.coos.or.us (Tom Osborne); Date: Wed, 17 Jun 1998 00:14:21 -0700; Yeah, lets get back to "How far should I stack my 40-2CD above my KLM-34XA." -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com Administrative requests:; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-06/msg00585.html (7,830 bytes)
6. [TowerTalk] Published score reports (score: 1): Author: rlboyd@CapAccess.org (Rich L. Boyd); Date: Tue, 16 Jun 1998 22:03:09 -0400 (EDT); I agree, I think it belongs on the 3830 reflector, not towertalk. I replied to both because the original was on both. 73 - Rich, KE3Q 73 - Rich Boyd, KE3Q -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/tow; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-06/msg00590.html (13,191 bytes)
7. [TowerTalk] Published Score Reports (score: 1): Author: davidc@bit-net.com (DavidC); Date: Tue, 16 Jun 1998 22:47:45 -0400; on the KLM-34XA." Or, how far above a KT34XA does a WARC-7 need to be stacked? Serious question ... though I know yours was tounge-in-cheek! 73, DavidC AA1FA -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-06/msg00592.html (7,062 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]