Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Q\s+on\s+guyed\s+rotating\s+towers\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Q\s+on\s+guyed\s+rotating\s+towers\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Q on guyed rotating towers (score: 1): Author: "Arthur Trampler" <atrampler@att.net>; Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 10:24:39 -0600; OK--I am not in the market for one of these, so this is for learning, only. With a rotating guyed tower, is there some sort of locking mechanism between the bearings and tower, at least in a given "p; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-02/msg00394.html (7,347 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] Q on guyed rotating towers (score: 1): Author: jimjarvis@optonline.net; Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 17:56:17 +0000 (GMT); Comments bottom-postedFrom: "Arthur Trampler" <atrampler@att.net>Subject: [TowerTalk] Q on guyed rotating towers<snip>From what I understand part of the strength of a guyed tower is that torsional mo; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-02/msg00395.html (7,925 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] Q on guyed rotating towers (score: 1): Author: K4SAV <RadioIR@charter.net>; Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 12:13:28 -0600; I guess I didn't follow the explaination. Why would there not be a difference in torsional loading between a tower constrained only at the bottom versus one constrained at both the top and bottom? Je; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-02/msg00397.html (9,462 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] Q on guyed rotating towers (score: 1): Author: <kr7x1@verizon.net>; Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 12:29:59 -0600 (CST); Jim/Arthur: Rotating towers tubular/cantilevered like berthas or triangular trussed like Rohn with rotating guy rings need to have some point fixed against rotation somewhere in their height to devel; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-02/msg00400.html (10,572 bytes)
5. Re: [TowerTalk] Q on guyed rotating towers (score: 1): Author: <atrampler@att.net>; Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 14:37:19 -0600; Mike, I think what you are saying is the stength of the tower itself is not changed, it is simply that whatever downforce is generated from torsional load on a guyed tower is not present, and that su; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-02/msg00402.html (10,058 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 5
Page: [1]