Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+QST\(Readers\)\s+on\s+drugs\s+\(was\:\s+2006\s+Top\s+Ten\s+Chutzpah\.\.\.\)\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TowerTalk] QST(Readers) on drugs (was: 2006 Top Ten Chutzpah...) (score: 1)
Author: "Ward Silver" <hwardsil@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 14:44:52 -0700
Yeah, but it's AUGUST now - my tiny brain can only think of one month at a time :-) 73, Ward N0AX _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ Towe
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-08/msg00854.html (6,971 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] QST(Readers) on drugs (was: 2006 Top Ten Chutzpah...) (score: 1)
Author: Bill Aycock <baycock@hughes.net>
Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 14:49:04 -0500
I thought I was nuts, looking through the August QST, then I went to the reading room (Dining room) and checked the SEPTEMBER Issue- there it was! Ward should be ashamed, he has an article in that sa
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-08/msg00914.html (11,021 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] QST(Readers) on drugs (was: 2006 Top Ten Chutzpah...) (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Ferguson" <Paul@PaulFerguson.us>
Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 08:22:12 -0400
Ward has a nice article in most issues. His response to the uproar made importants points. I have not noticed any good counter arguments. Maybe people took his advice: 73, Paul K5ESW _______________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-08/msg00916.html (8,272 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu