- 1. [TowerTalk] Quad Users (score: 1)
- Author: jduncan@nol.net (John T. Duncan)
- Date: Mon, 21 Dec 1998 09:40:02 -0600
- This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --=_NextPart_000_000A_01BE2CC5.E1C7CDE0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I currently have a KT34
- /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-12/msg00306.html (10,542 bytes)
- 2. [TowerTalk] Quad Users (score: 1)
- Author: w4an@contesting.com (Bill Fisher - W4AN)
- Date: Mon, 21 Dec 1998 13:38:32 -0500 (EST)
- Considering the amount of work you are going to invest in an antenna that will be largely unproven, I would suggest you take another look at a seperate antenna for 12/17 away from your tribander. Th
- /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-12/msg00310.html (7,693 bytes)
- 3. [TowerTalk] Quad Users (score: 1)
- Author: cebik@utkux.utcc.utk.edu (L. B. Cebik)
- Date: Tue, 22 Dec 1998 06:28:51 -0500 (EST)
- John, I have not studied your last question, but the first two have straightforward answers. 1. 5 bands is possible for a quad, but the individual quads for each band need slight refiguring. I have d
- /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-12/msg00315.html (11,334 bytes)
- 4. [TowerTalk] Quad Users (score: 1)
- Author: Paul.Ferguson@pobox.com (Paul Ferguson)
- Date: Tue, 22 Dec 1998 09:02:08 -0500
- I owned a Lightning Bolt 2-el 5 band quad for a few years. It used a common feed. I thought it performed well except on 10 meters. It had front/back on 10 but when I switched to an R-7 vertical for c
- /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-12/msg00317.html (9,449 bytes)
- 5. [TowerTalk] Quad Users (score: 1)
- Author: n4kg@juno.com (T A RUSSELL)
- Date: Wed, 23 Dec 1998 06:12:28 -0600
- I once installed a full size 40M dipole (wire on BIG bamboo poles) parallel to the elements on a Mosley 2L Quad (10 - 15 -20). There was some degradation of F/B on 15M but I considered this a small p
- /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-12/msg00336.html (7,941 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu