Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Quad\s+vs\s+SteppIR\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Quad\s+vs\s+SteppIR\s*$/: 14 ]

Total 14 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Quad vs SteppIR (score: 1): Author: Bill Ogden <ogden@us.ibm.com>; Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 10:22:03 -0400; I took down my 40' Aluminum tower and Cubex 5-band quad (separate feeds for each band) over a year ago before moving away for a year. The quad was a wonderful antenna, especially good for listening.; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-08/msg00659.html (8,518 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] Quad vs SteppIR (score: 1): Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>; Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 10:53:04 -0400; noticable easier to handle and but is this experiences about quad Hi Bill, This is all based on "how it works" data, not an actual comparison. I've had quads and Yagis, and the SteppIR is nothing bu; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-08/msg00660.html (9,896 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] Quad vs SteppIR (score: 1): Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>; Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 10:53:52 -0400; noticable easier to handle and but is this experiences about quad Hi Bill, This is all based on "how it works" data, not an actual comparison. I've had quads and Yagis, and the SteppIR is nothing bu; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-08/msg00661.html (9,486 bytes)
4. RE: [TowerTalk] Quad vs SteppIR (score: 1): Author: "N2TK" <tony.kaz@verizon.net>; Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 11:13:29 -0400; Hi Tom, When I had a quad and monobanders, the quad was always quieter from snow static than the monobanders. Was wondering if the SteppIR would be quieter than a regualr aluminum beam during a snow; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-08/msg00662.html (11,367 bytes)
5. Re: [TowerTalk] Quad vs SteppIR (score: 1): Author: "Richard M. Gillingham" <rmoodyg@bellsouth.net>; Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 11:20:14 -0400; I can't speak for snow static, living in south Florida, but the steppir is less prone to precip static because (I think) of the fact that the elements are enclosed in a "radome"... When some of my lo; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-08/msg00664.html (13,696 bytes)
6. Re: [TowerTalk] Quad vs SteppIR (score: 1): Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>; Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 11:57:13 -0400; quieter from snow would be quieter snow would be in static charge be There is some dispute about what causes snow static and such Tony. The two schools of thought are the noise comes from charges mi; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-08/msg00665.html (10,337 bytes)
7. Re: [TowerTalk] Quad vs SteppIR (score: 1): Author: <kk9a@arrl.net>; Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 17:01:42 -0000; There are times during storms that my upper antennas have heavy static and the lower ones are much quieter. Perhaps your antenna is low and less prone to static than your buddies? John KK9A I can't s; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-08/msg00668.html (14,885 bytes)
8. Re: [TowerTalk] Quad vs SteppIR (score: 1): Author: david jordan <wa3gin@erols.com>; Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 13:50:29 -0400; clarify please... Noise from point source such as a tower or building and percepitation static created when dropplets of rain or snow flakes that are charged come in contact with the elements of a ba; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-08/msg00670.html (18,503 bytes)
9. [TowerTalk] Quad vs SteppIR (score: 1): Author: ABowenN4OO <abowen@nettally.com>; Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 17:57:50 -0400; I took down my Lightning Bolt quad, which had been on a 70 ft tower for 9 years. I replaced it with the 3 el SteppIR. The first thing I noticed on 20M, was that I had to point the antenna in the dire; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-08/msg00678.html (8,938 bytes)
10. Re: [TowerTalk] Quad vs SteppIR (score: 1): Author: "W3YY" <w3yy@cox.net>; Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 02:04:41 -0000; I've had a 4-El SteppIR at 100ft for about a year now and have wondered about this possible "radome" effect. I seem to remember hearing precip static on my wire antennas while not hearing anything on; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-08/msg00688.html (16,534 bytes)
11. RE: [TowerTalk] Quad vs SteppIR (score: 1): Author: "Richard (Rick) Karlquist (N6RK)" <richard@karlquist.com>; Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 08:44:52 -0700; I have a Lightning Bolt quad and a 4 element SteppIR. My experience is the same, the SteppIR is way more directive than the quad. Before the quad, I had a KT34. It was also more directive than the qu; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-08/msg00695.html (9,012 bytes)
12. Re: [TowerTalk] Quad vs SteppIR (score: 1): Author: Joe Giacobello <k2xx@swva.net>; Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 20:32:18 -0400; Rick, I'm not sure what you mean by directive, but there's no doubt that quads have poorer F/B than Yagis. Quads seem to have a very narrow frequency range over which the F/B peaks, but across the re; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-08/msg00706.html (11,296 bytes)
13. Re: [TowerTalk] Quad vs SteppIR (score: 1): Author: "Michael Tope" <W4EF@dellroy.com>; Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 23:40:12 -0700; One big advantage of the quad that is often neglected is turning radius. Quads are great if you are in a tightly confined where you can't afford to have long yagi elements hanging over property lines; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-09/msg00001.html (9,175 bytes)
14. RE: [TowerTalk] Quad vs SteppIR (score: 1): Author: "Todd Coulter" <N4JRZ@arrl.net>; Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 12:09:44 -0400; Rick, How many elements was the quad? Todd N4JRZ --Original Message-- From: towertalk-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:towertalk-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Richard (Rick) Karlquist (N6RK) Sen; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-09/msg00006.html (8,796 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 14
Page: [1]