Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+RE\:\s+\[Antennas\]\s+coax\s+\'sweet\s+lenght\'\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] RE: [Antennas] coax 'sweet lenght' (score: 1)
Author: "David Robbins K1TTT" <k1ttt@arrl.net>
Date: Sun, 10 Oct 2004 13:59:44 -0000
coax Its an urban legend. The best length to use is one that reaches from the radio to the antenna. There are some exceptions if you are counting on the feedline to act as an impedance transformer..
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-10/msg00178.html (8,369 bytes)

2. [TowerTalk] Re: [Antennas] coax 'sweet lenght' (score: 1)
Author: Bob Nielsen <nielsen@oz.net>
Date: Sun, 10 Oct 2004 10:12:10 -0700
WRONG! Ignoring cable losses, the VSWR is independent the length of the cable. What changes with length are the complex components of the impedance, while the absolute value (VSWR) remains constant.
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-10/msg00186.html (10,806 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] Re: [Antennas] coax 'sweet lenght' (score: 1)
Author: "Gene Smar" <ersmar@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 10 Oct 2004 14:18:29 -0400
TT: I found this URL (among others) with a Yahoo search for Smith Chart: http://www.web-ee.com/primers/files/SmithCharts/smith_charts.htm . Look at Fig. 8 to see an example of a constant VSWR circle
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-10/msg00187.html (13,860 bytes)

4. [TowerTalk] Re: [Antennas] coax 'sweet lenght' (score: 1)
Author: Bob Nielsen <nielsen@oz.net>
Date: Sun, 10 Oct 2004 12:27:15 -0700
I haven't run any experiments, but I'll concede that some methods of measuring VSWR are less than perfect, in which case that is a definite possibility. Bob, N7XY -- Bob Nielsen, N7XY n7xy (at) n7xy.
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-10/msg00189.html (11,099 bytes)

5. [TowerTalk] RE: [Antennas] coax 'sweet lenght' (score: 1)
Author: "Chris Boone" <CBoone@earthlink.net>
Date: Sun, 10 Oct 2004 11:03:34 -0500
ANY feedline repeats the Load Z (Impedance) every 1/2wavelength..remember that must take into account the velocity factor of the feedline...for normal coax its about 66% so 0.66 x 468/freq in MHZ = l
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-10/msg00205.html (9,871 bytes)

6. [TowerTalk] RE: [Antennas] coax 'sweet lenght' (score: 1)
Author: "Chris Boone" <CBoone@earthlink.net>
Date: Sun, 10 Oct 2004 13:50:27 -0500
Ok...what I should have said was "apparent" SWR changes according to the metering..... If the cable length changes and the antenna is NOT a resistive only component, the coax will cause an apparent c
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-10/msg00206.html (10,359 bytes)

7. RE: [TowerTalk] RE: [Antennas] coax 'sweet lenght' (score: 1)
Author: "David Robbins K1TTT" <k1ttt@arrl.net>
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2004 13:58:13 -0000
factor is wl NOT wrong. The swr in the coax doesn't change with length, except for small losses that always reduce it. The problem is cheap meters or installations that have rf on the outside of the
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-10/msg00208.html (10,097 bytes)

8. Re: [TowerTalk] RE: [Antennas] coax 'sweet lenght' (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2004 10:19:40 -0400
as its 1/2 wl 50ohm +0j antenna is NOT WRONG SWR Sorry Chris, but that's neither correct or helpful. SWR is constant except for a small change from line loss, and reactance doesn't "fool" a properly
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-10/msg00209.html (10,682 bytes)

9. Re: [TowerTalk] RE: [Antennas] coax 'sweet lenght' (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2004 10:21:55 -0400
according to the resistive only reactance, thus That's incorrect also unless the meter is improperly calibrated. If the meter is that bad, you probably should not be using it. 73 Tom _______________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-10/msg00210.html (9,824 bytes)

10. FW: [TowerTalk] RE: [Antennas] coax 'sweet lenght' (score: 1)
Author: "Pete Stark" <pstark@charter.net>
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2004 10:22:09 -0400
The sweet length is infinity or zero. --Original Message-- From: towertalk-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:towertalk-bounces@contesting.com]On Behalf Of Tom Rauch Sent: Monday, October 11, 2004 10:22
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-10/msg00211.html (8,315 bytes)

11. Re: [TowerTalk] RE: [Antennas] coax 'sweet lenght' (score: 1)
Author: "Tower (K8RI)" <tower@rogerhalstead.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2004 10:36:45 -0400
Thanks Tom, I like that plain language description with the examples. I've known it works that way for years, but I never bothered to put any figures with it. Roger (K8RI) Tom Rauch wrote: <snip> SWR
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-10/msg00212.html (10,217 bytes)

12. RE: [TowerTalk] RE: [Antennas] coax 'sweet lenght' (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, K4IK" <k4ik@subich.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2004 11:06:27 -0400
All true ... however, if one is using 75 Ohm cable in a 50 Ohm system (e.g., CATV hardline) then the multiple of 1/2 wavelength shows a 1:1 SWR on a 50 Ohm bridge - exactly what is desired. The 75 O
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-10/msg00213.html (9,607 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu