Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+RE\:\s+BN\-86\s+High\s+Power\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+RE\:\s+BN\-86\s+High\s+Power\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] RE: BN-86 High Power (score: 1): Author: dbowker@shire.sjv.net (Dave Bowker); Date: Tue, 18 Nov 1997 07:18:55 -0500; In an word - DON'T! They are very economical to make, will survive any power you can afford to deliver to them, and you don't have to worry about core saturation and arcing when there's ice on your l; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-11/msg00473.html (7,856 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] RE: BN-86 High Power (score: 1): Author: mwalker@geronimo.legato.com (Mike Walker); Date: Wed, 19 Nov 1997 08:57:36 -0500; I would not use a BN-86 at anything over 100w. Having worked in a ham store for a number of years, we used to see them all the time. Came back looking like someone had them in an oven. Even when peop; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-11/msg00517.html (7,877 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]