Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+RE\:\s+Bent\s+Mast\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+RE\:\s+Bent\s+Mast\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] RE: Bent Mast (score: 1): Author: n3ue@arrl.net (Ed Wolf); Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2001 16:52:25 -0400; Don't know how high the tower is, but. I had a similar problem a few years ago on my 50 foot tower. What we ended up doing was climbing the tower and tossing a "heavy" rope over the top antenna, and; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-04/msg00491.html (7,502 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] RE: Bent Mast (score: 1): Author: n4kg@juno.com (n4kg@juno.com); Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2001 16:30:50 -0600; Interesting solution ! Did you remove the lower beam before you bent the mast over? Tom N4KG ________________________________________________________________ GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO! Juno offer; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-04/msg00492.html (8,806 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] RE: Bent Mast (score: 1): Author: n3ue@arrl.net (Ed Wolf); Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2001 20:13:58 -0400; No, the "lower beam" was 10 feet up the mast, and the mast bent at the one foot level. The mast was 18 feet out of the top of the tower. Ed Wolf - ars:N3UE - NA40+TR.PA http://members.home.net/wolfie; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-04/msg00500.html (7,666 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]