Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+RE\:\s+Erecting\s+tower\s*$/: 20 ]

Total 20 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] RE: Erecting tower (score: 1)
Author: kenneth.lowrey@wright.edu
Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2003 14:53:34 -0500
I am finally getting a tower after hamming for 41 years!! I plan to pour cement around one tower section and use this as a base. The township requires this procedure for the building permit. My quest
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00095.html (7,481 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] RE: Erecting tower (score: 1)
Author: K7LXC@aol.com
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2003 16:20:57 EST
the tower Umm...what kind of tower? Cheers, Steve K7LXC TOWER TECH - Professional tower services for commercial and amateur 888-833-3104 _______________________________________________ See: http://ww
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00097.html (7,611 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] RE: Erecting tower (score: 1)
Author: "Alan Braun" <albraun@earthlink.net>
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2003 16:44:30 -0600
I've done this twice, once with a self supporting and once with a guyed tower. Generally the best way to do it is to attach the 1st above-ground section to whatever you're going to be using as a base
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00100.html (9,634 bytes)

4. RE: [TowerTalk] RE: Erecting tower (score: 1)
Author: "Rex Lint" <rex@lint.mv.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2003 17:53:47 -0500
Ken, There's a dialogue, one could even say debate, about what's better: "pier pin" or buried section for a base. I've done both. The pier pin was recommended to me for my current 100 footer by peopl
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00101.html (10,653 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] RE: Erecting tower (score: 1)
Author: "Michael Hatzakis, Jr" <mikehatzakis@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2003 16:18:25 -0800 (PST)
don't most towers only attach by way of base plate? Most that I've seen you set the tower bolts in a wood frame and pour concrete around it. They need to be aligned well, but not perfectly plumb. the
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00102.html (9,178 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] RE: Erecting tower (score: 1)
Author: "Jim White, K4OJ" <k4oj@tampabay.rr.com>
Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2003 20:44:58 -0500
Assuming you got some relatively smaller tower: I have a small quantity of screw in anchors I bought at a flea market.... they work well as temporary guy point out about ten feet - I put a turnbuckle
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00103.html (9,223 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] RE: Erecting tower (score: 1)
Author: Phil - KB9CRY <kb9cry@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2003 19:50:04 -0600
If the tower has angle iron type of legs, then you lower the tower section into the hole after the rebar cage has been installed and support it off the bottom of the pit with solid concrete bricks. I
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00104.html (10,268 bytes)

8. RE: [TowerTalk] RE: Erecting tower (score: 1)
Author: kenneth.lowrey@wright.edu
Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2003 16:22:12 -0500
This is a good question. The tower type is Rohn 45. Thanks, Ken _______________________________________________ See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless Weather Stations
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00105.html (8,491 bytes)

9. Re: [TowerTalk] RE: Erecting tower (score: 1)
Author: Dino Darling <k6rix@earthlink.net>
Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2003 20:16:26 -0800
For those who may not know.... I wanted to point out what vibrating concrete does. It PECULATES the air pockets or VOIDS out of the pour (see below). Voids will cause weak spots in the base! If you O
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00106.html (9,341 bytes)

10. Re: [TowerTalk] RE: Erecting tower (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <wrt@dslextreme.com>
Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2003 20:37:14 -0800
On Wed, 03 Dec 2003 20:16:26 -0800, Dino Darling <k6rix@earthlink.net> wrote: _________________________________________________________ pec&middot;u&middot;late ( P ) Pronunciation Key (pky-lt) tr. &
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00107.html (8,733 bytes)

11. Re: [TowerTalk] RE: Erecting tower (score: 1)
Author: Dino Darling <k6rix@earthlink.net>
Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2003 23:01:27 -0800
Damn spell check.... PERCOLATE (like how REAL coffee is made!) (that will be 10cents please!) At 08:37 PM 12/03/2003 -0800, Bill Turner wrote: On Wed, 03 Dec 2003 20:16:26 -0800, Dino Darling <k6rix@
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00108.html (9,971 bytes)

12. Re: [TowerTalk] RE: Erecting tower (score: 1)
Author: Alan Beagley AB2OS <ab2os@att.net>
Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2003 10:56:49 -0500
I am sure I read a recommendation to wait at least a *month* on one of the tower manufacturers' Web sites. Alan AB2OS Phil - KB9CRY wrote: <snip> . . . Wait a week and remove all and start erecting!
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00127.html (8,821 bytes)

13. Re: [TowerTalk] RE: Erecting tower (score: 1)
Author: WD0M <wd0m@centurytel.net>
Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2003 10:50:22 -0700
I just poured a base for a self-supporting US Towers TX-455 - the local concrete guys said 7 days is sufficient. I used 4000 psi concrete, and the daily highs were in the 50s, lows sometimes into the
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00129.html (9,820 bytes)

14. Re: [TowerTalk] RE: Erecting tower (score: 1)
Author: Tom Anderson <WW5L@gte.net>
Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2003 12:09:24 -0600
Ken: When I put up Rohn 25 at my first QTH I bolted 2 sections together, made sure they were plumb, and tied them off in several directions before pouring the concrete. As the concrete as being poure
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00130.html (10,672 bytes)

15. Re: [TowerTalk] RE: Erecting tower (score: 1)
Author: gdaught6@stanford.edu
Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2003 12:34:25 -0800
My concrete guy (actually retired concrete guy, but doing occasional jobs to pick up a few bucks) explained it to me this way, which seemed very logical. You can take the forms off after 24+ hours, b
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00131.html (9,295 bytes)

16. Re: [TowerTalk] RE: Erecting tower (score: 1)
Author: kr7x@comcast.net
Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2003 21:11:25 +0000
George: That is pretty close to how it is. For everything but columns,elevated beams, and shear walls we spec stripping is ok after 7 days, for the execptions we use 14 days. 73 Hank Lonberg, P.E.,S.
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00132.html (10,138 bytes)

17. Re: [TowerTalk] RE: Erecting tower (score: 1)
Author: WD0M <wd0m@centurytel.net>
Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2003 14:24:58 -0700
Same story that I got from my local concrete guys (and a cousin who is in the concrete business). Must be true! 73, Joe WD0M At 01:34 PM 12/5/2003, gdaught6@stanford.edu wrote: On 5 Dec 2003 at 10:50
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00133.html (10,332 bytes)

18. Re: [TowerTalk] RE: Erecting tower (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Warnock" <k7xn@cox.net>
Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2003 15:55:41 -0700
on. EXACTLY as he said. -- Original Message -- From: "Dino Darling" <k6rix@earthlink.net> To: <TowerTalk@contesting.com> Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 9:16 PM Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] RE: Erect
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00140.html (11,093 bytes)

19. Re: [TowerTalk] RE: Erecting tower (score: 1)
Author: "Alan C. Zack" <k7acz@cox.net>
Date: Sat, 06 Dec 2003 19:32:40 -0800
Thanks for the info on your web site for your tower base. Having just moved to the Las Vegas suburbs to my retirement home away from the HOA and CC&R's I had in California I am ready to put up my tow
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00158.html (12,492 bytes)

20. Re: [TowerTalk] RE: Erecting tower (score: 1)
Author: K7LXC@aol.com
Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2003 11:16:05 EST
While adoption of the UBC (Uniform Building Code) is pretty widespread, many building departments use other codes or modify the UBC for their specific applications so basically they're ALL DIFFERENT.
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00188.html (10,565 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu