Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+RE\:\s+Ground\s+Rods\s+\+\s+Conductivity\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+RE\:\s+Ground\s+Rods\s+\+\s+Conductivity\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] RE: Ground Rods + Conductivity (score: 1): Author: k0wa@southwind.net (Lee Buller); Date: Fri, 18 Apr 1997 12:07:36 -0500; It has been interesting reading all the posts about ground rods. I will be working on mine under the tower this weekend. Adding more of them. Here in Kansas...with its rich soil (with some gumbo here; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-04/msg00560.html (7,555 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] RE: Ground Rods + Conductivity (score: 1): Author: w5ec@digitalexp.com (Hawkins, Bill); Date: Fri, 18 Apr 1997 12:59:43 -0500; Speaking of ground conductivity--When I was in Sask. Canada last year I noticed that the power lines had only one conductor-no neutral. The pole transformers had one side connected to the ground wir; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-04/msg00564.html (7,536 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] RE: Ground Rods + Conductivity (score: 1): Author: dick@merlin.libelle.com (Dick Flanagan); Date: Fri, 18 Apr 1997 12:43:05 -0700; I don't know about Canada, but these are common in Australia where there are tremendous distances to cover to get power to remote ranches. They are called SWER (Single Wire Earth Return) systems and; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-04/msg00567.html (7,647 bytes)
4. [TowerTalk] RE: Ground Rods + Conductivity (score: 1): Author: wtill@bordercity.com (William Till); Date: Sat, 19 Apr 1997 21:17:37 -0600; Works for us. Sask Power did some exhaustive research many years ago and found that the cost of installing a ground return wire would not be justified. Lightning doesn't seem to be any greater proble; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-04/msg00609.html (9,481 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]