- 1. [TowerTalk] RE: Tower Wind Calcs (score: 1)
- Author: "W7AOR" <w7aor@narri.org>
- Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 15:41:44 -0800
- Nevada P.E. wet stamp on docs for $250. Take it. That is cheap. No PE local could do that. Interesting that Henderson is asking for 90 mph. I thought that one could just put up a tower in Henderson w
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00330.html (11,084 bytes)
- 2. Re: [TowerTalk] RE: Tower Wind Calcs (score: 1)
- Author: "Jim Lux" <jimlux@earthlink.net>
- Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 07:20:56 -0800
- It may not even be possible to have any antenna area at 90.. The allowed cross sectional area is dropping faster than windspeed squared.. There's something else at work than simple canteliever loads
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00332.html (9,677 bytes)
- 3. Re: [TowerTalk] RE: Tower Wind Calcs (score: 1)
- Author: "Richard M. Gillingham" <rmoodyg@bellsouth.net>
- Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 10:26:26 -0500
- Who puts a wet stamp on building proposals for all those trees?? They blow down all the time. Who approves those permits? Just a thought.. I thought a thought, but the thought I thought was not the t
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00333.html (11,585 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu